人口論
- 语言:
- 英语
- 状态:
- 完整作品
- 作者归属:
- 作者本人所著
- 文本状况:
- 文本清晰
- 篇幅:
- 约 65,300 词 · 310 个段落
引用本作品
- APA托马斯·马尔萨斯. (n.d.). 人口論. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/thomas-malthus/an-essay-on-the-principle-of-population
- MLA托马斯·马尔萨斯. "人口論." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/thomas-malthus/an-essay-on-the-principle-of-population.
- Chicago托马斯·马尔萨斯. 人口論. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/thomas-malthus/an-essay-on-the-principle-of-population.
内容简介
《人口原理》(1798年)。
背景与流传
人口按几何级数增长,食物按算术级数增长:于是饥荒成了躲不开的抑制。它最初是匿名发表的。达尔文和华莱士各自独立地从中找到了自然选择还缺的那一块。它也被拿去为对穷人极其严苛的政策辩护,这一点值得知道。
这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。
AN ESSAY ON THE PRINCIPLE OF POPULATION, AS IT AFFECTS THE FUTURE IMPROVEMENT OF SOCIETY WITH REMARKS ON THE SPECULATIONS OF MR. GODWIN, M. CONDORCET, AND OTHER WRITERS. LONDON, PRINTED FOR J. JOHNSON, IN ST. PAUL'S CHURCH-YARD, 1798. Preface The following Essay owes its origin to a conversation with a friend, on the subject of Mr Godwin's essay on avarice and profusion, in his Enquirer. The discussion started the general question of the future improvement of society, and the Author at first sat down with an intention of merely stating his thoughts to his friend, upon paper, in a clearer manner than he thought he could do in conversation. But as the subject opened upon him, some ideas occurred, which he did not recollect to have met with before; and as he conceived that every least light, on a topic so generally interesting, might be received with candour, he determined to put his thoughts in a form for publication. The Essay might, undoubtedly, have been rendered much more complete by a collection of a greater number of facts in elucidation of the general argument. But a long and almost total interruption from very particular business, joined to a desire (perhaps imprudent) of not delaying the publication much beyond the time that he originally proposed, prevented the Author from giving to the subject an undivided attention. He presumes, however, that the facts which he has adduced will be found to form no inconsiderable evidence for the truth of his opinion respecting the future improvement of mankind. As the Author contemplates this opinion at present, little more appears to him to be necessary than a plain statement, in addition to the most cursory view of society, to establish it.