SigPhiSigPhi

托马斯·潘恩文集全编

托马斯·潘恩

语言:
英语
状态:
完整作品
作者归属:
作者本人所著
文本状况:
文本清晰 · 1 段无法辨读,已从回答中排除
篇幅:
约 420,000 词 · 1,972 个段落
引用本作品
  • APA托马斯·潘恩. (n.d.). 托马斯·潘恩文集全编. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/thomas-paine/the-writings-of-thomas-paine-complete
  • MLA托马斯·潘恩. "托马斯·潘恩文集全编." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/thomas-paine/the-writings-of-thomas-paine-complete.
  • Chicago托马斯·潘恩. 托马斯·潘恩文集全编. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/thomas-paine/the-writings-of-thomas-paine-complete.

内容简介

潘恩全集:《常识》与《危机》,写于美国革命之中;《人的权利》,对柏克的回应;以及《理性时代》,自然神论对启示宗教的攻击。

背景与流传

《常识》一七七六年一月问世,数周之内售出数万册——而当时全国人口不过二百五十万:少有小册子能在这么短的时间里推动这么多。《理性时代》让他付出了代价——人们把他当作无神论者,其实他所维护的是一个没有教会的上帝——一八〇九年他去世时,葬礼上几乎无人到场。

这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。

开篇
THOMAS PAINE, in his Will, speaks of this work as The American Crisis, remembering perhaps that a number of political pamphlets had appeared in London, 1775-1776, under general title of "The Crisis." By the blunder of an early English publisher of Paine's writings, one essay in the London "Crisis" was attributed to Paine, and the error has continued to cause confusion. This publisher was D. I. Eaton, who printed as the first number of Paine's "Crisis" an essay taken from the London publication. But his prefatory note says: "Since the printing of this book, the publisher is informed that No. 1, or first Crisis in this publication, is not one of the thirteen which Paine wrote, but a letter previous to them." Unfortunately this correction is sufficiently equivocal to leave on some minds the notion that Paine did write the letter in question, albeit not as a number of his "Crisis "; especially as Eaton's editor unwarrantably appended the signature "C. S.," suggesting "Common Sense." There are, however, no such letters in the London essay, which is signed "Casca." It was published August, 1775, in the form of a letter to General Gage, in answer to his Proclamation concerning the affair at Lexington. It was certainly not written by Paine. It apologizes for the Americans for having, on April 19, at Lexington, made "an attack upon the King's troops from behind walls and lurking holes." The writer asks: "Have not the Americans been driven believe the power of hell to be limited, we must likewise believe that their agents are under some providential control. I shall not now attempt to give all the particulars of our retreat to the Delaware; suffice it for the present to say, that both officers and men, though greatly harassed and fatigued, frequently without rest, covering, or provision, the inevitable consequences of a long retreat, bore it with a manly and martial spirit.…

阅读全文 →

← 返回托马斯·潘恩