SigPhiSigPhi

可敬的开创者奥卡姆的威廉论祭坛圣事之论著〔T……译〕

奥卡姆的威廉

语言:
英语
状态:
完整作品
作者归属:
作者本人所著
文本状况:
含扫描错误 (对全文的自动评估,未经人工核对)
篇幅:
约 44,800 词 · 213 个段落
引用本作品
  • APA奥卡姆的威廉. (n.d.). Tractatus venerabilis inceptoris guilhelmi ocham de Sacramento altaris [tr. by T [可敬的开创者奥卡姆的威廉论祭坛圣事之论著〔T……译〕]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/william-of-ockham/tractatus-venerabilis-inceptoris-guilhelmi-ocham-de-sacramento-altaris-tr-by-t
  • MLA奥卡姆的威廉. Tractatus venerabilis inceptoris guilhelmi ocham de Sacramento altaris [tr. by T [可敬的开创者奥卡姆的威廉论祭坛圣事之论著〔T……译〕]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/william-of-ockham/tractatus-venerabilis-inceptoris-guilhelmi-ocham-de-sacramento-altaris-tr-by-t.
  • Chicago奥卡姆的威廉. Tractatus venerabilis inceptoris guilhelmi ocham de Sacramento altaris [tr. by T [可敬的开创者奥卡姆的威廉论祭坛圣事之论著〔T……译〕]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/william-of-ockham/tractatus-venerabilis-inceptoris-guilhelmi-ocham-de-sacramento-altaris-tr-by-t.

这是 SigPhi 所复制版本的引用:SigPhi 是其数字复制品,不是出版者。元数据中没有版本年份(因此写作“n.d.”),译者只有在有记录时才列出。

内容简介

《论祭坛圣事》。

背景与流传

奥卡姆讨论圣体圣事里究竟发生了什么,顺带用上了他那条不要增设实体的原则:量并不是有别于实体的东西。问题是神学的,贡献是形而上学的——这是能看见那把冠他之名的「剃刀」在干活的地方之一。 原文为拉丁文。这里是英译本;引用应以原文为准。

这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。

开篇
investigator in the realm of truth,a member of the order of the Fratres Minores, concerning the sacrament of the altar and with special referg | enee to the distinction of voint, Line, surfade, body, quantity, quality, and substance,begins euspiciously.. _ Gonserning the conversion of the bread into the body 9f of Christ, just as states ea sertain gloss on De Consecra~_ tione, Distinction T¥,*In secramentorum": "There are various opinions. One opinion asserts that that substance, which was at first bread,is afterwards the flesh and the blood lof Christ, that is,the bread is an the altar et cetera, ecause the body is vresent. The sesond opinion holds thet the substance of the bread and the vine oeases to jexict there,and only the accidents remain;nanely, taste, jcolor and likeness;and under these accidents the body lor Christ begins to exist there. The third opinion — Inoldas that the substance of the bread and the vine remains there,and that the body of christ existe poth lin the same vlace and under the same svecies;it is argued, that is,I advance this argument." Kagh opinion, however, acknowledges that the body of Christ is present here. The second opinion is more true according to he De Sumne Trinitetes *Pirmiter,# une"; these are the ords of the Gloss. According to this gloss it appears at the substance of the bread is converted into the vody of Christ,so that the substance of the bread doos Jnot romain, but only the accidents,rhich existed before } in the substange of the bread,remain. And in confir~ mation of that truth it is stated according to the De Summa Trinitate, "Firmiter",iust as the gloss previously mentioned asserts: "There is one univeraal church of all the feithful,outside of whieh no one at 211 is saved;in which the vriest and the sacupfice are the very sane person,Jesus Christ, vhose bone and blood are truly contained in the sacrament of the altar under the species of bread and wine,since the bread…

阅读全文 →

← 返回奥卡姆的威廉