SigPhiSigPhi

Histoire des animaux

Aristote

Langue:
anglais
État:
Œuvre complète
Paternité:
Écrite par l'auteur
État du texte:
Texte propre
Étendue:
~130 000 mots · 633 passages
Citer cette œuvre
  • APAAristote. (n.d.). Histoire des animaux. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/aristotle/aristotle-s-history-of-animals
  • MLAAristote. "Histoire des animaux." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/aristotle/aristotle-s-history-of-animals.
  • ChicagoAristote. Histoire des animaux. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/aristotle/aristotle-s-history-of-animals.

De quoi il s'agit

La compilation par Aristote de ce que l'on savait et de ce qu'il observa lui-même sur les animaux : le plus ancien traité de zoologie conservé.

Contexte et histoire

« Histoire » signifie ici enquête, non récit du passé. L'ouvrage décrit les parties, les mœurs, la reproduction, la nourriture et le comportement de centaines d'espèces, et c'est la méthode qui le rend remarquable : Aristote dissèque, compare et classe, et là où il n'a pas vu une chose, il le dit ou nomme son informateur. Il y a des erreurs — beaucoup, dont certaines viennent de pêcheurs et d'éleveurs qui l'ont mal renseigné — et il y a des observations qui ne furent confirmées de nouveau qu'au XIXe siècle, comme la reproduction du poulpe ou le développement jour après jour de l'embryon du poulet. Darwin écrivit que ses propres dieux de la science n'étaient que des écoliers auprès du vieil Aristote.

Contexte éditorial, non une source citable : contrairement aux passages de l'œuvre, ces données ne peuvent pas être vérifiées dans le corpus.

Comment cela commence
The following Translation of Aristotle's History of Animals has been made from the text of Schneider. In a work of considerable difficulty it is hardly possible entirely to avoid errors; but it is hoped that those which have escaped are neither numerous nor important. The notes of Schneider have been consulted throughout; and in places of difficulty the English translation by Taylor, the French of Camus, and the German of Strack, have been severally referred to. The work itself is the most ancient and celebrated contribution to science which has come down to us; and it is hardly possible, when we consider the means of observation which were accessible at the time, to imagine a work of more accurate observation. From the numerous quotations in which our author avails himself of the experience of his predecessors in the same field, as well as corrects their errors, there can be no doubt that Aristotle had the advantage of many works which have perished in the lapse of ages. In the Appendix to the present Translation will be found the Essay of Schneider on the sources whence Aristotle derived his knowledge of the animals he describes; and these sources, together with his own accurate observations, are probably sufficient to account for the correct knowledge of the history of animals displayed throughout the work. It is right, perhaps, to observe in this place, that Dr. Smith, in his Dictionary of Biography, speaks of the 'History of Animals' as partly the result of the royal liberality of Alexander; and doubtless Aristotle would gladly have introduced into his work any fresh materials which might have been made available to him either during his residence at the Macedonian court, or by the subsequent victories of Alexander in the East, if the information so obtained had reached Athens in sufficient time to be incorporated.…

Lire l'œuvre entière →

← Retour à Aristote