SigPhiSigPhi

De la locomotion des animaux

Aristote

Langue:
anglais
État:
Œuvre complète
Paternité:
Écrite par l'auteur
État du texte:
Texte propre
Étendue:
~9 470 mots · 45 passages
Citer cette œuvre
  • APAAristote. (n.d.). De la locomotion des animaux. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/aristotle/on-the-progression-of-animals
  • MLAAristote. "De la locomotion des animaux." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/aristotle/on-the-progression-of-animals.
  • ChicagoAristote. De la locomotion des animaux. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/aristotle/on-the-progression-of-animals.

De quoi il s'agit

Pourquoi les animaux ont les membres qu'ils ont, et pourquoi toujours en nombre pair.

Contexte et histoire

De l'anatomie comparée avant que le nom existe : la forme des membres y est rapportée au mode de locomotion et au milieu. L'un des textes où l'Aristote observateur de terrain est le plus visible.

Contexte éditorial, non une source citable : contrairement aux passages de l'œuvre, ces données ne peuvent pas être vérifiées dans le corpus.

Comment cela commence
We have now to consider the parts which are useful to animals for movement in place (locomotion); first, why each part is such as it is and to what end they possess them; and second, the differences between these parts both in one and the same creature, and again by comparison of the parts of creatures of different species with one another. First then let us lay down how many questions we have to consider. The first is what are the fewest points of motion necessary to animal progression, the second why sanguineous animals have four points and not more, but bloodless animals more than four, and generally why some animals are footless, others bipeds, others quadrupeds, others polypods, and why all have an even number of feet, if they have feet at all; why in fine the points on which progression depends are even in number. Next, why are man and bird bipeds, but fish footless; and why do man and bird, though both bipeds, have an opposite curvature of the legs. For man bends his legs convexly, a bird has his bent concavely; again, man bends his arms and legs in opposite directions, for he has his arms bent convexly, but his legs concavely. And a viviparous quadruped bends his limbs in opposite directions to a man's, and in opposite directions to one another; for he has his forelegs bent convexly, his hind legs concavely. Again, quadrupeds which are not viviparous but oviparous have a peculiar curvature of the limbs laterally away from the body. Again, why do quadrupeds move their legs criss-cross? We have to examine the reasons for all these facts, and others cognate to them; that the facts are such is clear from our Natural History, we have now to ask reasons for the facts. Part 2

Lire l'œuvre entière →

← Retour à Aristote