SigPhiSigPhi

Maximes capitales

Épicure

Langue:
anglais
État:
Œuvre complète
Paternité:
Écrite par l'auteur
État du texte:
Aucun bruit de numérisation détecté (mesure automatique sur tout le texte, non vérifiée à la main)
Étendue:
~1 900 mots · 9 passages
Citer cette œuvre
  • APAÉpicure. (n.d.). Principal Doctrines [Maximes capitales]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/epicurus/principal-doctrines
  • MLAÉpicure. Principal Doctrines [Maximes capitales]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/epicurus/principal-doctrines.
  • ChicagoÉpicure. Principal Doctrines [Maximes capitales]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/epicurus/principal-doctrines.

Référence de l’édition reproduite. SigPhi est la reproduction numérique. Année, éditeur et traducteur sont indiqués lorsqu’ils sont connus ; « n.d. » signale une année inconnue.

De quoi il s'agit

Les Maximes capitales : quarante sentences à apprendre par cœur.

Contexte et histoire

Les épicuriens les mémorisaient, et c'est pourquoi elles ont survécu. La première nie que les dieux s'occupent de nous ; la deuxième, que la mort nous concerne. Diogène Laërce les a recopiées en entier, et c'est la seule raison pour laquelle nous les avons.

Contexte éditorial, non une source citable : contrairement aux passages de l'œuvre, ces données ne peuvent pas être vérifiées dans le corpus.

Extrait de l’édition disponible
7. Some people have sought to become famous and renowned, thinking that thus they would make themselves secure against their fellow-humans. If, then, the life of such persons really was secure, they attained natural good; if, however, it was insecure, they have not attained the end which by nature's own prompting they originally sought. 8. No pleasure is in itself evil, but the things which produce certain pleasures entail annoyances many times greater than the pleasures themselves. 9. If all pleasure had been capable of accumulation, -- if this had gone on not only be recurrences in time, but all over the frame or, at any rate, over the principal parts of human nature, there would never have been any difference between one pleasure and another, as in fact there is. 10. If the objects which are productive of pleasures to profligate persons really freed them from fears of the mind, -- the fears, I mean, inspired by celestial and atmospheric phenomena, the fear of death, the fear of pain; if, further, they taught them to limit their desires, we should never have any fault to find with such persons, for they would then be filled with pleasures to overflowing on all sides and would be exempt from all pain, whether of body or mind, that is, from all evil. 11. If we had never been molested by alarms at celestial and atmospheric phenomena, nor by the misgiving that death somehow affects us, nor by neglect of the proper limits of pains and desires, we should have had no need to study natural science. 12. It would be impossible to banish fear on matters of the highest importance, if a person did not know the nature of the whole universe, but lived in dread of what the legends tell us. Hence without the study of nature there was no enjoyment of unmixed pleasures. 13.…

Lire cette édition →

← Retour à Épicure