Éloge de la folie (ed. 2)
- Langue:
- anglais
- État:
- Œuvre complète
- Paternité:
- Écrite par l'auteur
- État du texte:
- Aucun bruit de numérisation détecté (mesure automatique sur tout le texte, non vérifiée à la main)
- Étendue:
- ~36 800 mots · 175 passages
Citer cette œuvre
- APAÉrasme. (n.d.). The Praise of Folly [Éloge de la folie (ed. 2)]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/erasmus/the-praise-of-folly
- MLAÉrasme. The Praise of Folly [Éloge de la folie (ed. 2)]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/erasmus/the-praise-of-folly.
- ChicagoÉrasme. The Praise of Folly [Éloge de la folie (ed. 2)]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/erasmus/the-praise-of-folly.
Référence de l'édition que reproduit SigPhi : SigPhi en est la reproduction numérique, pas l'éditeur. L'année de l'édition ne figure pas dans les métadonnées (d'où « n.d. ») et le traducteur n'apparaît que lorsqu'il est connu.
De quoi il s'agit
L'Éloge de la folie : la SECONDE traduction anglaise que possède le catalogue.
Contexte et histoire
C'est la même œuvre que « In Praise of Folly », en d'autres mots. Ce n'est pas un doublon et les deux restent : deux traductions sont deux livres, et la numérotation des chapitres ne coïncide pas toujours. En citant, dire laquelle des deux. Une traduction anglaise. Le latin d'Érasme, qui est ce qu'il faut citer, n'est au catalogue que dans l'anthologie d'épîtres.
Contexte éditorial, non une source citable : contrairement aux passages de l'œuvre, ces données ne peuvent pas être vérifiées dans le corpus.
heretofore they were wont to have their shares, till in one of their angry humors they tumbled him, together with Ate, goddess of mischief, down headlong to the earth, because his wisdom, forsooth, unseasonably disturbed their happiness. Nor since that dares any mortal give him harbor, though I must confess there wanted little but that he had been received into the courts of princes, had not my companion Flattery reigned in chief there, with whom and the other there is no more correspondence than between lambs and wolves. From whence it is that the gods play the fool with the greater liberty and more content to themselves "doing all things carelessly," as says Father Homer, that is to say, without anyone to correct them. For what ridiculous stuff is there which that stump of the fig tree Priapus does not afford them? What tricks and legerdemains with which Mercury does not cloak his thefts? What buffoonery that Vulcan is not guilty of, while one with his polt-foot, another with his smutched muzzle, another with his impertinencies, he makes sport for the rest of the gods? As also that old Silenus with his country dances, Polyphemus footing time to his Cyclops hammers, the nymphs with their jigs, and satyrs with their antics; while Pan makes them all twitter with some coarse ballad, which yet they had rather hear than the Muses themselves, and chiefly when they are well whittled with nectar. Besides, what should I mention what these gods do when they are half drunk? Now by my troth, so foolish that I myself can hardly refrain laughter. But in these matters 'twere better we remembered Harpocrates, lest some eavesdropping god or other take us whispering that which Momus only has the privilege of speaking at length. And therefore, according to Homer's example, I think it high time to leave the gods to themselves, and look down a little on the earth; wherein likewise you'll find nothing frolic or fortunate that it owes not to me.…