L'Évolution créatrice
- Langue:
- anglais
- État:
- Œuvre complète
- Paternité:
- Écrite par l'auteur
- État du texte:
- Avec des erreurs de numérisation (mesure automatique sur tout le texte, non vérifiée à la main) · 10 passages illisibles, exclus des réponses
- Étendue:
- ~180 000 mots · 844 passages
Citer cette œuvre
- APAHenri Bergson. (n.d.). Creative Evolution [L'Évolution créatrice]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/henri-bergson/creative-evolution
- MLAHenri Bergson. Creative Evolution [L'Évolution créatrice]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/henri-bergson/creative-evolution.
- ChicagoHenri Bergson. Creative Evolution [L'Évolution créatrice]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/henri-bergson/creative-evolution.
Référence de l'édition que reproduit SigPhi : SigPhi en est la reproduction numérique, pas l'éditeur. L'année de l'édition ne figure pas dans les métadonnées (d'où « n.d. ») et le traducteur n'apparaît que lorsqu'il est connu.
De quoi il s'agit
La proposition de Bergson que l'évolution ne s'explique ni par le hasard ni par un plan préétabli, mais par un élan — l'élan vital — qui essaie des voies et se partage en directions divergentes.
Contexte et histoire
Paru en 1907, le livre connut un succès considérable hors de la philosophie et fit de lui une célébrité ; en 1927 il reçut le prix Nobel de littérature. Ce qui a le mieux tenu n'est pas l'élan vital, que la biologie n'a jamais admis, mais la critique de la façon dont l'entendement fabrique le temps : Bergson soutient que la pensée, faite pour l'action, change la durée en une succession d'instants immobiles, et qu'elle ne peut donc penser ce qui change.
Contexte éditorial, non une source citable : contrairement aux passages de l'œuvre, ces données ne peuvent pas être vérifiées dans le corpus.
From this survival of the past it follows that consciousness cannot go through the same state twice. The circumstances may still be the same, but they will act no longer on the same person, since they find him at a new moment of his history. Our personality, which is being built up each instant with its accumulated experience, changes without ceasing. By changing, it prevents any state, although superficially identical with another, from ever repeating it in its very depth. That is why our duration is irreversible. We could not live over again a single moment, for we should have to begin by effacing the memory of all that had followed. Even could we erase this memory from our intellect, we could not from our will. Thus our personality shoots, grows and ripens without ceasing. Each of its moments is something new added to what was before. We may go further: it is not only something new, but something unforeseeable. Doubtless, my present state is explained by what was in me and by what was acting on me a moment ago. In analyzing it I should find no other elements. But even a superhuman intelligence would not have been able to foresee the simple indivisible form which gives to these purely abstract elements their concrete organization. For to foresee consists of projecting into the future what has been perceived in the past, or of imagining for a later time a new grouping, in a new order, of elements already perceived. But that which has never been perceived, and which is at the same time simple, is necessarily unforeseeable. Now such is the case with each of our states, regarded as a moment in a history that is gradually unfolding: it is simple, and it cannot have been already perceived, since it concentrates in its indivisibility all that has been perceived and what the present is adding to it besides. It is an original moment of a no less original history.