Émile ou De l'éducation
- Langue:
- anglais
- État:
- Choix ou œuvre partielle
- Paternité:
- Écrite par l'auteur
- État du texte:
- Aucun bruit de numérisation détecté (mesure automatique sur tout le texte, non vérifiée à la main)
- Étendue:
- ~48 200 mots · 229 passages
Citer cette œuvre
- APAJean-Jacques Rousseau. (n.d.). Émile; Or, Concerning Education; Extracts [Émile ou De l'éducation]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/jean-jacques-rousseau/emile-or-concerning-education-extracts
- MLAJean-Jacques Rousseau. Émile; Or, Concerning Education; Extracts [Émile ou De l'éducation]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/jean-jacques-rousseau/emile-or-concerning-education-extracts.
- ChicagoJean-Jacques Rousseau. Émile; Or, Concerning Education; Extracts [Émile ou De l'éducation]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/jean-jacques-rousseau/emile-or-concerning-education-extracts.
Référence de l'édition que reproduit SigPhi : SigPhi en est la reproduction numérique, pas l'éditeur. L'année de l'édition ne figure pas dans les métadonnées (d'où « n.d. ») et le traducteur n'apparaît que lorsqu'il est connu.
De quoi il s'agit
Émile, ou De l'éducation : des EXTRAITS, non l'œuvre complète.
Contexte et histoire
**Attention : c'est une sélection.** L'Émile complet est un ouvrage en cinq livres qui a valu à Rousseau d'être condamné et le livre d'être brûlé à Paris et à Genève en 1762. Ce que cette entrée possède, ce sont des extraits en anglais ; l'original français complet, Émile, ou De l'éducation, figure aussi au catalogue, et c'est lui qu'il faut citer.
Contexte éditorial, non une source citable : contrairement aux passages de l'œuvre, ces données ne peuvent pas être vérifiées dans le corpus.
not consider how, for the sake of preserving him for a moment from some inconveniences, she is heaping upon his head future accidents and perils; nor how cruel is the caution which prolongs the weakness of childhood in one who must bear the fatigues of a grown-up man. The fable says that, to render her son invulnerable, Thetis plunged him into the Styx. This allegory is beautiful and clear. The cruel mothers of whom I am speaking do far otherwise; by plunging their children into effeminacy they open their pores to ills of every kind, to which, when grown up, they fall a certain prey. Watch nature carefully, and follow the paths she traces out for you. She gives children continual exercise; she strengthens their constitution by ordeals of every kind; she teaches them early what pain and trouble mean. The cutting of their teeth gives them fever, sharp fits of colic throw them into convulsions, long coughing chokes them, worms torment them, repletion corrupts their blood, different leavens fermenting there cause dangerous eruptions. Nearly the whole of infancy is sickness and danger; half the children born into the world die before their eighth year. These trials past, the child has gained strength, and as soon as he can use life, its principle becomes more assured. This is the law of nature. Why do you oppose her? Do you not see that in thinking to correct her you destroy her work and counteract the effect of all her cares? In your opinion, to do without what she is doing within is to redouble the danger. On the contrary, it is really to avert, to mitigate that danger. Experience teaches that more children who are delicately reared die than others. Provided we do not exceed the measure of their strength, it is better to employ it than to hoard it. Give them practice, then, in the trials they will one day have to endure.…