SigPhiSigPhi

Defence of Usury

Jeremy Bentham

Langue:
anglais
État:
Œuvre complète
Paternité:
Écrite par l'auteur
État du texte:
Aucun bruit de numérisation détecté (mesure automatique sur tout le texte, non vérifiée à la main)
Étendue:
~45 300 mots · 215 passages
Citer cette œuvre
  • APAJeremy Bentham. (n.d.). Defence of Usury. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/jeremy-bentham/defence-of-usury
  • MLAJeremy Bentham. Defence of Usury. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/jeremy-bentham/defence-of-usury.
  • ChicagoJeremy Bentham. Defence of Usury. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/jeremy-bentham/defence-of-usury.

Référence de l’édition reproduite. SigPhi est la reproduction numérique. Année, éditeur et traducteur sont indiqués lorsqu’ils sont connus ; « n.d. » signale une année inconnue.

De quoi il s'agit

Défense de l'usure (1787) : contre le plafonnement légal du taux d'intérêt.

Contexte et histoire

Écrit sous forme de lettres depuis la Russie. L'argument est qu'aucun adulte ne devrait être empêché de convenir du prix d'un prêt. Adam Smith, qui défendait bien un plafond, a reconnu plus tard que Bentham avait raison — l'une des rares fois où on le voit céder.

Contexte éditorial, non une source citable : contrairement aux passages de l'œuvre, ces données ne peuvent pas être vérifiées dans le corpus.

Extrait de l’édition disponible
To put a stop to prodigality, if indeed it be worth while, I know but of one effectual course that can be taken, in addition to the incompleat and insufficient courses at present practicable, and that is, to put the convicted prodigal under an interdict, as was practised formerly among the Romans, and is still practised among the French, and other nations who have taken the Roman law for the ground-work of their own. But to discuss the expediency, or sketch out the details of such an institution, belongs not to the present purpose. LETT. IV. Reasons for Restraint. LETTER IV. Reasons for Restraint Protection of Indigence. BESIDES prodigals, there are three other classes of persons, and but three, for whose security I can conceive these restrictive laws to have been designed. I mean the indigent, the rashly enterprizing, and the simple : those whose pecuniary necessities may dispose them to give an interest above the ordinary rate, rather than not have it, and those who, from rashness, may be disposed to venture upon giving such a rate, or from carelessness combined with ignorance, may be disposed to acquiesce in it. In Protection of Indigence. S3 In Protection of Indigence. S3 In speaking of these three different classes of persons, I must beg leave to consider one of them at a time : and accordingly, in speaking of the indigent, I must consider indigence in the first place as untinctured with simplicity. On this occasion, I may suppose, and ought to suppose, no particular defect in a man's judgment, or his temper, that should mislead him, more than the ordinary run of men. He knows what is his interest as well as they do, and is as well disposed and able to pursue it as they are.…

Lire cette édition →

← Retour à Jeremy Bentham