Du système nivelant
- Langue:
- anglais
- État:
- Œuvre complète
- Paternité:
- Écrite par l'auteur
- État du texte:
- Aucun bruit de numérisation détecté (mesure automatique sur tout le texte, non vérifiée à la main)
- Étendue:
- ~7 160 mots · 34 passages
Citer cette œuvre
- APAJeremy Bentham. (n.d.). Of the Levelling System [Du système nivelant]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/jeremy-bentham/of-the-levelling-system
- MLAJeremy Bentham. Of the Levelling System [Du système nivelant]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/jeremy-bentham/of-the-levelling-system.
- ChicagoJeremy Bentham. Of the Levelling System [Du système nivelant]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/jeremy-bentham/of-the-levelling-system.
Référence de l'édition que reproduit SigPhi : SigPhi en est la reproduction numérique, pas l'éditeur. L'année de l'édition ne figure pas dans les métadonnées (d'où « n.d. ») et le traducteur n'apparaît que lorsqu'il est connu.
De quoi il s'agit
Du système de nivellement : sur l'égalisation des fortunes.
Contexte et histoire
Bentham demande si redistribuer la richesse augmente le bonheur total. La réponse a deux moitiés qu'on cite d'ordinaire séparément : oui, parce que le même argent vaut davantage pour qui en a moins ; mais non si cela détruit la sécurité de la propriété, qu'il tient pour la condition de tout le reste.
Contexte éditorial, non une source citable : contrairement aux passages de l'œuvre, ces données ne peuvent pas être vérifiées dans le corpus.
many thousands of pounds to lend, so many thousands more than they have need to employ otherwise. Upon the equalisation scheme, all these monied men would be no more: nobody would have any thing he could spare for any length of time, much less for ever; no man would have any thing but from hand to mouth. As to the gainers — (I speak always of the immediate and momentary gainers, for ultimately, as we shall see, there would scarcely be a real gainer left in the nation) — as to the real gainers, if they were to be looked for any where, it would be in the class of the present day-labourers in husbandry. Their employment need not be changed; they would continue labourers in husbandry, with this comfortable difference, as it would be thought, of labouring upon, and for the benefit of their own property, instead of other people's. But even these would for the most part gain nothing but ruin by the change. Their fragments of farms having no buildings on them, would be useless to them till buildings could be erected. A man might farm profitably, and live comfortably a year or two hence, if he were then alive: but in the meantime he would not be able to farm or live at all. The immense multitude of new created farms, all of them without buildings, would require an immense and instant multiplication of the number of workmen concerned in building. But this number, instead of being multiplied, or so much as increased, would be as immediately and permanently reduced: for they too would have their portions, as well as the labourers in husbandry: if they laboured any longer, it would be upon their own property, not upon other people’s. If they laboured at all, what inducement would they have to labour upon other peoples property, or indeed for other people? What would they get by it? an
Poser une question sur cette œuvreDe quoi parle Du système nivelant ?Résumez Du système nivelant brièvementQuelles sont les idées clés de Du système nivelant ?
← Retour à Jeremy Bentham