Considérations inactuelles, partie I (David Strauss ; Richard Wagner à Bayreuth)
- Langue:
- anglais
- État:
- Œuvre complète
- Paternité:
- Écrite par l'auteur
- État du texte:
- Texte propre
- Étendue:
- ~63 400 mots · 301 passages
Citer cette œuvre
- APANietzsche. (n.d.). Considérations inactuelles, partie I (David Strauss ; Richard Wagner à Bayreuth). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/nietzsche/thoughts-out-of-season-part-i-david-strauss-richard-wagner-in-bayreuth
- MLANietzsche. "Considérations inactuelles, partie I (David Strauss ; Richard Wagner à Bayreuth)." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/nietzsche/thoughts-out-of-season-part-i-david-strauss-richard-wagner-in-bayreuth.
- ChicagoNietzsche. Considérations inactuelles, partie I (David Strauss ; Richard Wagner à Bayreuth). SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/nietzsche/thoughts-out-of-season-part-i-david-strauss-richard-wagner-in-bayreuth.
De quoi il s'agit
Le premier volume des Considérations inactuelles : contre David Strauss, et Richard Wagner à Bayreuth.
Contexte et histoire
L'attaque contre Strauss, c'est le Nietzsche polémiste à l'état pur : il ne discute pas la théologie mais la prose, et le portrait du « philistin de la culture » — le bourgeois cultivé qui prend ce qui lui plaît pour ce qui est bon — pique encore. **À noter :** Richard Wagner à Bayreuth figure aussi comme œuvre séparée. Ce n'est pas un doublon : le volume et l'essai seul sont des éditions différentes et les deux restent. Traduction anglaise tirée de l'édition complète dirigée par Oscar Levy (1909-1913), celle qui est du domaine public. Elle a plus d'un siècle et cela se voit. L'original est ALLEMAND, et c'est lui qu'il faut citer : le catalogue en contient deux, Also sprach Zarathustra et Der Wille zur Macht ; pour le reste, seule la traduction est ici.
Contexte éditorial, non une source citable : contrairement aux passages de l'œuvre, ces données ne peuvent pas être vérifiées dans le corpus.
Public opinion in Germany seems strictly to forbid any allusion to the evil and dangerous consequences of a war, more particularly when the war in question has been a victorious one. Those writers, therefore, command a more ready attention who, regarding this public opinion as final, proceed to vie with each other in their jubilant praise of the war, and of the powerful influences it has brought to bear upon morality, culture, and art. Yet it must be confessed that a great victory is a great danger. Human nature bears a triumph less easily than a defeat; indeed, it might even be urged that it is simpler to gain a victory of this sort than to turn it to such account that it may not ultimately prove a serious rout. But of all evil results due to the last contest with France, the most deplorable, perhaps, is that widespread and even universal error of public opinion and of all who think publicly, that German culture was also victorious in the struggle, and that it should now, therefore, be decked with garlands, as a fit recognition of such extraordinary events and successes. This error is in the highest degree pernicious: not because it is an error,--for there are illusions which are both salutary and blessed,--but because it threatens to convert our victory into a signal defeat. A defeat?--I should say rather, into the uprooting of the "German Mind" for the benefit of the "German Empire." Even supposing that the fight had been between the two cultures, the standard for the value of the victor would still be a very relative one, and, in any case, would certainly not justify such exaggerated triumph or self-glorification. For, in the first place, it would be necessary to ascertain the worth of the conquered culture. This might be very little; in which case, even if the victory had involved the most glorious display of arms, it would still offer no warrant for inordinate rapture.…