Dictionnaire philosophique, volume 04
⚠️ Avertissement de contenu
- Langue:
- anglais
- État:
- Œuvre complète
- Paternité:
- Écrite par l'auteur
- État du texte:
- Aucun bruit de numérisation détecté (mesure automatique sur tout le texte, non vérifiée à la main)
- Étendue:
- ~84 000 mots · 399 passages
Citer cette œuvre
- APAVoltaire. (n.d.). A Philosophical Dictionary, Volume 04 [Dictionnaire philosophique, volume 04]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/voltaire/a-philosophical-dictionary-volume-04
- MLAVoltaire. A Philosophical Dictionary, Volume 04 [Dictionnaire philosophique, volume 04]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/voltaire/a-philosophical-dictionary-volume-04.
- ChicagoVoltaire. A Philosophical Dictionary, Volume 04 [Dictionnaire philosophique, volume 04]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/voltaire/a-philosophical-dictionary-volume-04.
Référence de l’édition reproduite. SigPhi est la reproduction numérique. Année, éditeur et traducteur sont indiqués lorsqu’ils sont connus ; « n.d. » signale une année inconnue.
De quoi il s'agit
Tome 4 sur dix du Dictionnaire philosophique. Catéchisme chinois – Curiosité. Il poursuit le dialogue chinois et va jusqu'au curé de campagne.
Contexte et histoire
Le fond est la forme : un dictionnaire se consulte au lieu de se lire d'un bout à l'autre, ce qui le rendait impossible à réfuter en bloc et facile à faire circuler sous le manteau. Voltaire l'a publié anonymement en 1764 et on l'a brûlé à Genève et à Paris. Note sur l'édition : le catalogue contient DEUX éditions du Dictionnaire philosophique — celle-ci en dix volumes et un Voltaire's Philosophical Dictionary en un seul. Ce n'est pas un doublon : ce sont des choix et des traductions différents, et les articles ne se correspondent pas un à un. L'original est français.
Contexte éditorial, non une source citable : contrairement aux passages de l'œuvre, ces données ne peuvent pas être vérifiées dans le corpus.
contradict the fatal error, and to send to the parliament of Toulouse an attestation upon oath that not only did Protestants not destroy their children, but that they were left masters of their whole property when they quitted their sect for another. It is known that, notwithstanding this attestation, Calas was broken on the wheel. A country magistrate of the name of Londes, assisted by graduates as sagacious as himself, became eager to make every preparation for following up the example which had been furnished at Toulouse. A village doctor, equally enlightened with the magistrate, boldly affirmed, on inspecting the body after the expiration of eighteen days, that the young woman had been strangled, and afterwards thrown into the well. On this deposition the magistrate issued a warrant to apprehend the father, mother, and the two daughters. The family, justly terrified at the catastrophe of Calas, and agreeably to the advice of their friends, betook themselves instantly to flight; they travelled amidst snow during a rigorous winter, and, toiling over mountain after mountain, at length arrived at those of Switzerland. The daughter, who was married and pregnant, was prematurely delivered amidst surrounding ice. The first intelligence this family received, after reaching a place of safety, was that the father and mother were condemned to be hanged; the two daughters to remain under the gallows during the execution of their mother, and to be reconducted by the executioner out of the territory, under pain of being hanged if they returned. Such is the lesson given to contumacy! This judgment was equally absurd and abominable. If the father, in concert with his wife, had strangled his daughter, he ought to have been broken on the wheel, like Calas, and the mother to have been burned--at least, after having been strangled--because the practice of breaking women on the wheel is not yet the custom in the country of this judge.…