Dictionnaire philosophique (VII)
⚠️ Avertissement de contenu
- Langue:
- anglais
- Traduction:
- William F. Fleming
- État:
- Choix ou œuvre partielle
- Paternité:
- Écrite par l'auteur
- État du texte:
- Aucun bruit de numérisation détecté (mesure automatique sur tout le texte, non vérifiée à la main)
- Étendue:
- ~77 700 mots · 369 passages
Citer cette œuvre
- APAVoltaire. (n.d.). A Philosophical Dictionary, Volume 07 [Dictionnaire philosophique (VII)] (William F. Fleming, Trans.). Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/voltaire/a-philosophical-dictionary-volume-07
- MLAVoltaire. A Philosophical Dictionary, Volume 07 [Dictionnaire philosophique (VII)]. Translated by William F. Fleming. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/voltaire/a-philosophical-dictionary-volume-07.
- ChicagoVoltaire. A Philosophical Dictionary, Volume 07 [Dictionnaire philosophique (VII)]. Translated by William F. Fleming. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/fr/works/voltaire/a-philosophical-dictionary-volume-07.
Référence de l'édition que reproduit SigPhi : SigPhi en est la reproduction numérique, pas l'éditeur. L'année de l'édition ne figure pas dans les métadonnées (d'où « n.d. ») et le traducteur n'apparaît que lorsqu'il est connu.
De quoi il s'agit
Tome 7 sur dix du Dictionnaire philosophique. Ignorance – Lois. Les articles sur les lois et sur la justice.
Contexte et histoire
Le fond est la forme : un dictionnaire se consulte au lieu de se lire d'un bout à l'autre, ce qui le rendait impossible à réfuter en bloc et facile à faire circuler sous le manteau. Voltaire l'a publié anonymement en 1764 et on l'a brûlé à Genève et à Paris. Note sur l'édition : le catalogue contient DEUX éditions du Dictionnaire philosophique — celle-ci en dix volumes et un Voltaire's Philosophical Dictionary en un seul. Ce n'est pas un doublon : ce sont des choix et des traductions différents, et les articles ne se correspondent pas un à un. L'original est français.
Contexte éditorial, non une source citable : contrairement aux passages de l'œuvre, ces données ne peuvent pas être vérifiées dans le corpus.
Perhaps, by attending a little to the progress of his life, and the nature of his character, we may discover what it was that inspired him with so strong an aversion to Christianity. The emperor Constantine, his great-uncle, who had placed the new religion on the throne, was stained by the murder of his wife, his son, his brother-inlaw, his nephew, and his father-in-law. The three children of Constantine began their bloody and baleful reign, with murdering their uncle and their cousins. From that time followed a series of civil wars and murders. The father, the brother, and all the relations of Julian, and even Julian himself, were marked down for destruction by Constantius, his uncle. He escaped this general massacre, but the first years of his life were passed in exile, and he at last owed the preservation of his life, his fortune, and the title of Cæsar, only to Eusebia, the wife of his uncle Constantius, who, after having had the cruelty to proscribe his infancy, had the imprudence to appoint him Cæsar, and the still further and greater imprudence of then persecuting him. He was, in the first instance, a witness of the insolence with which a certain bishop treated his benefactress Eusebia. He was called Leontius, and was bishop of Tripoli. He sent information to the empress, "that he would not visit her unless she would consent to receive him in a manner corresponding to his episcopal dignity--that is, that she should advance to receive him at the door, that she should receive his benediction in a bending attitude, and that she should remain standing until he granted her permission to be seated." The Pagan pontiffs were not in the habit of treating princesses precisely in this manner, and such brutal arrogance could not but make a deep impression on the mind of a young man attached at once to philosophy and simplicity.