Etica
- Lingua:
- inglese
- Stato:
- Opera completa
- Autorialità:
- Scritta dall'autore
- Stato del testo:
- Nessun rumore di scansione rilevato (misura automatica su tutto il testo, non verificata a mano)
- Estensione:
- ~89.100 parole · 423 passi
Cita quest'opera
- APABaruch Spinoza. (n.d.). Ethics [Etica]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/it/works/baruch-spinoza/ethics
- MLABaruch Spinoza. Ethics [Etica]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/it/works/baruch-spinoza/ethics.
- ChicagoBaruch Spinoza. Ethics [Etica]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/it/works/baruch-spinoza/ethics.
Riferimento all’edizione riprodotta. SigPhi è la riproduzione digitale. Anno, editore e traduttore compaiono quando noti; «n.d.» indica un anno sconosciuto.
Di che cosa tratta
Un sistema completo — Dio, la mente, gli affetti, la libertà — dimostrato come geometria: definizioni, assiomi e proposizioni che culminano nell'idea che la libertà è comprendere la necessità.
Contesto e storia
Spinoza terminò l'Etica verso il 1675 e rinunciò a pubblicarla in vita: lo scandalo del suo 'Deus sive Natura' — Dio e la Natura come una cosa sola — l'avrebbe sepolto. Apparve nel 1677, mesi dopo la sua morte, nelle Opera Posthuma, e fu proibita quasi subito. L'autore era vissuto all'Aia molando lenti, scomunicato dalla comunità ebraica di Amsterdam a ventitré anni con un anatema di durezza mai revocata. Per un secolo 'spinozista' fu un insulto; poi, per l'idealismo tedesco e per molti altri, la montagna con cui ogni filosofia deve misurarsi.
Contesto editoriale, non una fonte citabile: a differenza dei passi dell'opera, questi dati non si possono verificare sul corpus.
as they think, bring it about, that those things which we have said follow from his nature--that is, which are in his power, should not come to pass, or should not be produced by him. But this is the same as if they said, that God could bring it about, that it should follow from the nature of a triangle that its three interior angles should not be equal to two right angles; or that from a given cause no effect should follow, which is absurd. Moreover, I will show below, without the aid of this proposition, that neither intellect nor will appertain to God's nature. I know that there are many who think that they can show, that supreme intellect and free will do appertain to God's nature; for they say they know of nothing more perfect, which they can attribute to God, than that which is the highest perfection in ourselves. Further, although they conceive God as actually supremely intelligent, they yet do not believe that he can bring into existence everything which he actually understands, for they think that they would thus destroy God's power. If, they contend, God had created everything which is in his intellect, he would not be able to create anything more, and this, they think, would clash with God's omnipotence; therefore, they prefer to asset that God is indifferent to all things, and that he creates nothing except that which he has decided, by some absolute exercise of will, to create. However, I think I have shown sufficiently clearly (by Prop. xvi.), that from God's supreme power, or infinite nature, an infinite number of things--that is, all things have necessarily flowed forth in an infinite number of ways, or always flow from the same necessity; in the same way as from the nature of a triangle it follows from eternity and for eternity, that its three interior angles are equal to two right angles.…