SigPhiSigPhi

On the Improvement of the Understanding

バールーフ・デ・スピノザ

言語:
英語
状態:
完全な作品
著者性:
著者自身による
テキストの状態:
スキャンのノイズは検出されていません (全文に対する自動測定で、人の目では確認していません)
分量:
約 16,800 語 · 80 節
この作品を引用
  • APAバールーフ・デ・スピノザ. (n.d.). On the Improvement of the Understanding. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/baruch-spinoza/on-the-improvement-of-the-understanding
  • MLAバールーフ・デ・スピノザ. On the Improvement of the Understanding. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/baruch-spinoza/on-the-improvement-of-the-understanding.
  • Chicagoバールーフ・デ・スピノザ. On the Improvement of the Understanding. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/baruch-spinoza/on-the-improvement-of-the-understanding.

SigPhi が再現している版の参照です。SigPhi はそのデジタル再現であり、出版者ではありません。版の刊行年はメタデータにないため「n.d.」とし、訳者は記録がある場合のみ記します。

何についての本か

よく知るために知性をいかに正すべきかを論じた、スピノザの未完の論考の英訳。

背景と歴史

冒頭の一頁は、スピノザの他のどこにも似ていない。富も名誉も快楽も持続する何ものをも与えぬと見てとり、与えるような善を探そうと決めた、という一人称の告白である。続く部分だけでも方法は見てとれる。われわれが知る仕方を分けること——伝聞により、漠然たる経験により、推論により、そして第四に、あるものをその本質によって捉えること——そして、値するのは最後のものだけだと示すこと。この論考は未完のまま残された。スピノザはこれを捨てて『エチカ』を書いた。あちらは方法を説明するのではなく、用いてしまう。だからこそ、ここが最良の入口である。幾何学がすべてを覆ってしまう前に、彼が何を求めていたのかが見える。

これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。

冒頭
that it may thus proceed, our method must furnish us, first, with a means of distinguishing a true idea from all other perceptions, and enabling the mind to avoid the latter; secondly, with rules for perceiving unknown things according to the standard of the true idea; thirdly, with an order which enables us to avoid useless labor. (49:4) When we became acquainted with this method, we saw that, fourthly, it would be perfect when we had attained to the idea of the absolutely perfect Being. (5) This is an observation which should be made at the outset, in order that we may arrive at the knowledge of such a being more quickly. [50] (1) Let us then make a beginning with the first part of the method, which is, as we have said, to distinguish and separate the true idea from other perceptions, and to keep the mind from confusing with true ideas those which are false, fictitious, and doubtful. (2) I intend to dwell on this point at length, partly to keep a distinction so necessary before the reader's mind, and also because there are some who doubt of true ideas, through not having attended to the distinction between a true perception and all others. (3) Such persons are like men who, while they are awake, doubt not that they are awake, but afterwards in a dream, as often happens, thinking that they are surely awake, and then finding that they were in error, become doubtful even of being awake. (4) This state of mind arises through neglect of the distinction between sleeping and waking. [51] (1) Meanwhile, I give warning that I shall not here give essence of every perception, and explain it through its proximate cause. (2) Such work lies in the province of philosophy. (3) I shall confine myself to what concerns method--that is, to the character of fictitious, false and doubtful perceptions, and the means of freeing ourselves therefrom. (4) Let us then first inquire into the nature of a fictitious idea.…

全文を読む →

← バールーフ・デ・スピノザに戻る