SigPhiSigPhi

A Vindication of Natural Society

エドマンド・バーク

言語:
英語
状態:
完全な作品
著者性:
著者自身による
テキストの状態:
良好なテキスト
分量:
約 20,400 語 · 97
この作品を引用
  • APAエドマンド・バーク. (n.d.). A Vindication of Natural Society. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/edmund-burke/a-vindication-of-natural-society
  • MLAエドマンド・バーク. "A Vindication of Natural Society." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/edmund-burke/a-vindication-of-natural-society.
  • Chicagoエドマンド・バーク. A Vindication of Natural Society. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/edmund-burke/a-vindication-of-natural-society.

何についての本か

『自然社会の擁護』(一七五六年)。多くの人が額面どおりに受け取った風刺。

背景と歴史

バークはボリングブルックの筆致を真似て、その議論が教会だけでなくあらゆる統治にも向けられうることを示す。匿名で出たので、読者の半分は本気と受け取った。よくできた風刺がいつも冒す危険である。

これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。

冒頭
1748, and the Perfon to whom it is addreffed need not be pointed out. As it is probable the Noble Writer had no Defign that it fhould ever appear in Publick, this will account for his having kept no Copy of it, and confequently, for it's not appearing amongft the reft of his Works. By what Means it came into the Hands of the Editor, is not at' all material to the Publick, any farther than as fuch an Account might tend to authenticate the Genuinenefs of it, and for this it was thought it might fafely rely on it's own internal Evidence. A LETTER T O SHALL I venture to fay, my Lord, that in our late Converfation, you were inclined to the Party which you adopted rather by the Feelings of your good Nature, than by the Conviction of your Judgment ? We laid open the Foundations of Society ; and you feared, that the Curiofity of this Search might endanger the Ruin of the whole Fabrick. You would readily have allowed my Principle, but you dreaded the Confequences -, you thought, that having once entered upon B thefe thefe Reafonings, we might be carried infenfibly and irrefiftably farther than at firft we could either have imagined or wifhed. But for my part, my Lord, I then thought, and am ftill of the fame Opinion, that Error, and not Truth of any Kind, is dangerous j that ill Conclufions can only flow from falfe Propofitions >y and that, to know whether any Proportion be true or falfe, it is a prepoflerous Method to examine it by it's apparent Confequences. Thefe were the Reafons which induced me to go fo far into that Enquiry; and they are the Reafons which direct me in all my Enquiries.…

全文を読む →

← エドマンド・バークに戻る