主要教説
- 言語:
- 英語
- 状態:
- 完全な作品
- 著者性:
- 著者自身による
- テキストの状態:
- スキャンのノイズは検出されていません (全文に対する自動測定で、人の目では確認していません)
- 分量:
- 約 1,900 語 · 9 節
この作品を引用
- APAエピクロス. (n.d.). Principal Doctrines [主要教説]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/epicurus/principal-doctrines
- MLAエピクロス. Principal Doctrines [主要教説]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/epicurus/principal-doctrines.
- Chicagoエピクロス. Principal Doctrines [主要教説]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/epicurus/principal-doctrines.
SigPhi が再現している版の参照です。SigPhi はそのデジタル再現であり、出版者ではありません。版の刊行年はメタデータにないため「n.d.」とし、訳者は記録がある場合のみ記します。
何についての本か
『主要教説』。暗記されるための四十の文。
背景と歴史
エピクロス派の人々はこれを暗記した。だから残っている。第一は神々が我々にかかわることを否定し、第二は死が我々に及ぶことを否定する。ディオゲネス・ラエルティオスが丸ごと書き写しており、我々がこれを持っているのはそのおかげだけである。
これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。
7. Some people have sought to become famous and renowned, thinking that thus they would make themselves secure against their fellow-humans. If, then, the life of such persons really was secure, they attained natural good; if, however, it was insecure, they have not attained the end which by nature's own prompting they originally sought. 8. No pleasure is in itself evil, but the things which produce certain pleasures entail annoyances many times greater than the pleasures themselves. 9. If all pleasure had been capable of accumulation, -- if this had gone on not only be recurrences in time, but all over the frame or, at any rate, over the principal parts of human nature, there would never have been any difference between one pleasure and another, as in fact there is. 10. If the objects which are productive of pleasures to profligate persons really freed them from fears of the mind, -- the fears, I mean, inspired by celestial and atmospheric phenomena, the fear of death, the fear of pain; if, further, they taught them to limit their desires, we should never have any fault to find with such persons, for they would then be filled with pleasures to overflowing on all sides and would be exempt from all pain, whether of body or mind, that is, from all evil. 11. If we had never been molested by alarms at celestial and atmospheric phenomena, nor by the misgiving that death somehow affects us, nor by neglect of the proper limits of pains and desires, we should have had no need to study natural science. 12. It would be impossible to banish fear on matters of the highest importance, if a person did not know the nature of the whole universe, but lived in dread of what the legends tell us. Hence without the study of nature there was no enjoyment of unmixed pleasures. 13.…