SigPhiSigPhi

宇宙の諸現象、あるいは哲学構築のための博物誌

フランシス・ベーコン

言語:
英語
状態:
完全な作品
著者性:
著者自身による
テキストの状態:
スキャンのノイズは検出されていません (全文に対する自動測定で、人の目では確認していません)
分量:
約 3,160 語 · 15 節
この作品を引用
  • APAフランシス・ベーコン. (n.d.). Phenomena of the Universe Or Natural History for the Building Up of Philosophy [宇宙の諸現象、あるいは哲学構築のための博物誌]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/francis-bacon/phenomena-of-the-universe-or-natural-history-for-the-building-up-of-philosophy
  • MLAフランシス・ベーコン. Phenomena of the Universe Or Natural History for the Building Up of Philosophy [宇宙の諸現象、あるいは哲学構築のための博物誌]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/francis-bacon/phenomena-of-the-universe-or-natural-history-for-the-building-up-of-philosophy.
  • Chicagoフランシス・ベーコン. Phenomena of the Universe Or Natural History for the Building Up of Philosophy [宇宙の諸現象、あるいは哲学構築のための博物誌]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/francis-bacon/phenomena-of-the-universe-or-natural-history-for-the-building-up-of-philosophy.

SigPhi が再現している版の参照です。SigPhi はそのデジタル再現であり、出版者ではありません。版の刊行年はメタデータにないため「n.d.」とし、訳者は記録がある場合のみ記します。

何についての本か

『宇宙の諸現象』。『大革新』の第三部にあたる自然誌。

背景と歴史

ベーコンの計画は、いかなる理論よりも先に、観察された事実の膨大な集積を要求していた。これはその始まりであり、彼が仕上げられた全部でもある。彼自身が最も必要だと考えた部分であり、そして最も未完のまま残された部分である。

これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。

冒頭
But the chemists and the whole pack of mechanics and empirics, should they have the temerity to attempt contemplation and philosophy, being accustomed to meticulous subtlety in a few things, they twist by extraordinary means all the rest into conformity with them and promote opinions more odious and unnatural than those advanced by the very rationalists. For the latter take for the matter of philosophy very little out of many things, the former a great deal out of a few, but in truth those courses are weak and past cure. But the Natural History which has been accumulated hitherto may seem abundant on casual inspection, while in reality it is sketchy and useless, and not even of the kind I am seeking. For it has not been stripped of fables and ravings, and it rushes into antiquity, philology and superfluous narratives, neglectful and high-handed in matters of weight, overscrupulous and immoderate in matters of no importance. But the worst thing about this abundance is that it has embraced the inquiry into things natural but largely spurned that into things mechanical. Now the latter are far better than the former for examining nature's recesses; for nature of its own accord, free and shifting, disperses the intellect and confuses it with its variety, but in mechanical operations the judgment is concentrated, and we see nature's modes and processes, not just its effects. Yet, on the other hand, all the subtlety of mechanics stops short of what I am seeking. For the craftsman, intent on his work and its end, does not direct his mind or put his hand to other things, things which perhaps do more for the inquiry into nature.

全文を読む →

← フランシス・ベーコンに戻る