反デューリング論
- 言語:
- 英語
- 状態:
- 完全な作品
- 著者性:
- 著者自身による
- テキストの状態:
- スキャンのノイズは検出されていません (全文に対する自動測定で、人の目では確認していません)
- 分量:
- 約 76,600 語 · 364 節
この作品を引用
- APAフリードリヒ・エンゲルス. (n.d.). Landmarks of Scientific Socialism Anti-Duehring [反デューリング論]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/friedrich-engels/landmarks-of-scientific-socialism-anti-duehring
- MLAフリードリヒ・エンゲルス. Landmarks of Scientific Socialism Anti-Duehring [反デューリング論]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/friedrich-engels/landmarks-of-scientific-socialism-anti-duehring.
- Chicagoフリードリヒ・エンゲルス. Landmarks of Scientific Socialism Anti-Duehring [反デューリング論]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/friedrich-engels/landmarks-of-scientific-socialism-anti-duehring.
収録版の書誌情報です。SigPhi はデジタル複製です。判明している刊行年・出版社・翻訳者を記載し、年が不明の場合は「n.d.」と示します。
何についての本か
『反デューリング論』（一八七八年）。オイゲン・デューリングへの反論であり、そのついでに体系の全体でもある。
背景と歴史
エンゲルスはベルリンの一教授を論破するつもりで書き始め、結果として、哲学と経済学と社会主義を一度に扱ったマルクス主義の唯一の完全な叙述を書いてしまった。何十年ものあいだ、人々が実際にマルクス主義を学んだのは『資本論』よりはるかにこの本によってである。 英訳である。エンゲルスのドイツ語原本は目録にない。
これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。
equality before the law, that when the rights of man were proclaimed bourgeois rights of property were proclaimed at one and the same time, and that the state of reason, Rousseau's Social Contract, could only come into existence as the bourgeois democratic republic. To such a slight extent could the great thinkers of the eighteenth century, just as their predecessors, prevail over the limits which their own epoch had placed upon them. But besides the antagonism between feudal baron and bourgeois there existed the general antagonism between the robbers and the robbed, between the rich idlers and the toiling poor. It was just this antagonism which made it possible for the leaders of the bourgeoisie to pose as the representatives not merely of a special class but of the whole of suffering humanity. Furthermore the bourgeoisie was saddled with an antithesis right from the start. Capitalists cannot exist without laborers, and, in proportion, as the members of the gilds in the Middle Ages developed into the modern bourgeois, the journeymen of the gilds and the day laborers, on their part, developed into the proletariat. And though the bourgeois, as a general rule, might claim to represent also the interests of the different working classes of the period, still, independent movements of the latter classes broke out in connection with each great movement on the part of the bourgeoisie; such working classes being the more or less developed predecessors of the modern proletariat. Thus there came into being at the time of the German Reformation and the Peasant War the party of Thomas Munzer, in the great English Revolution the Levellers, and in the great French Revolution, Baboeuf. Besides these revolutionary demonstrations of a class still undeveloped, occurred certain theoretical manifestations of a corresponding nature.…