Dogmatic Treatises, etc. (NPNF Series II, Vol. V)
- 言語:
- 英語
- 状態:
- 抄録または部分的な作品
- 著者性:
- 著者自身による
- テキストの状態:
- スキャン誤りあり (全文に対する自動測定で、人の目では確認していません) · 判読できない箇所 8 件は回答から除外しています
- 分量:
- 約 680,000 語 · 3,210 節
この作品を引用
- APAニュッサのグレゴリオス. (n.d.). Dogmatic Treatises, etc. (NPNF Series II, Vol. V). Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/gregory-of-nyssa/dogmatic-treatises-etc-npnf-series-ii-vol-v
- MLAニュッサのグレゴリオス. Dogmatic Treatises, etc. (NPNF Series II, Vol. V). Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/gregory-of-nyssa/dogmatic-treatises-etc-npnf-series-ii-vol-v.
- Chicagoニュッサのグレゴリオス. Dogmatic Treatises, etc. (NPNF Series II, Vol. V). Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/gregory-of-nyssa/dogmatic-treatises-etc-npnf-series-ii-vol-v.
収録版の書誌情報です。SigPhi はデジタル複製です。判明している刊行年・出版社・翻訳者を記載し、年が不明の場合は「n.d.」と示します。
何についての本か
英語版『ニカイア前後教父集』に収められたニュッサのグレゴリオスの教義論考。エウノミオス駁論と『大教理講話』。
背景と歴史
エウノミオスとの論争の争点は、神の本質は認識されうるか、である。グレゴリオスはできないと説く。それについて語るために用いる名はわれわれのものであって、神が何であるかには届かない。この議論こそ、のちのギリシア的否定神学の基礎となった。このシリーズ全体と同じく、本巻は十九世紀の編者による括りであって、グレゴリオスが構想した単位ではない。収められた著作は一緒に書かれたのでもなければ、同じ読者に向けて書かれたのでもない。
これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。
He next marvellously overthrows the unintelligible statements of Eunomius which assert that the essence of the Father is not separated or divided, and does not become anything else. He then shows the unity of the Son with the Father and Eunomius' lack of understanding and knowledge in the Scriptures. Gregory further shows that the Only-Begotten being begotten not only of the Father, but also impassibly of the Virgin by the Holy Ghost, does not divide the substance; seeing that neither is the nature of men divided or severed from the parents by being begotten, as is ingeniously demonstrated from the instances of Adam and Abraham. He further very appositely expounds the meaning of the term “Only-Begotten, “ and of the term “First born,“ four times used by the Apostle. Gregory again discusses the generation of the Only-Begotten, and other different modes of generation, material and immaterial, and nobly demonstrates that the Son is the brightness of the Divine glory, and not a creature. He explains the phrase “The Lord created Me,” and the argument about the origination of the Son, the deceptive character of Eunomius' reasoning, and the passage which says, “My glory will I not give to another,” examining them from different points of view. After expounding the high estate of the Almighty, the Eternity of the Son, and the phrase “being made obedient,” he shows the folly of Eunomius in his assertion that the Son did not acquire His sonship by obedience. He thus proceeds to a magnificent discourse of the interpretation of 236 “Mediator,” “Like,” “Ungenerate,” and “generate,” and of “The likeness and seal of the energy of the Almighty and of His Works.” He expounds the passage of the Gospel, “The Father judgeth no man,” and = 242 further speaks of the assumption of man with body and soul wrought by the Lord, of the transgression of Adam, and of death and the resurrection of the dead.…
この作品について質問するDogmatic Treatises, etc. (NPNF Series II, Vol. V)は何についての作品ですか?Dogmatic Treatises, etc. (NPNF Series II, Vol. V)を簡潔に要約してくださいDogmatic Treatises, etc. (NPNF Series II, Vol. V)の重要な思想は何ですか?
← ニュッサのグレゴリオスに戻る