女性の解放
- 言語:
- 英語
- 状態:
- 完全な作品
- 著者性:
- 著者自身による
- テキストの状態:
- スキャンのノイズは検出されていません (全文に対する自動測定で、人の目では確認していません)
- 分量:
- 約 12,400 語 · 59 節
この作品を引用
- APAハリエット・テイラー. (n.d.). Enfranchisement of women [女性の解放]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/harriet-taylor/enfranchisement-of-women
- MLAハリエット・テイラー. Enfranchisement of women [女性の解放]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/harriet-taylor/enfranchisement-of-women.
- Chicagoハリエット・テイラー. Enfranchisement of women [女性の解放]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/harriet-taylor/enfranchisement-of-women.
収録版の書誌情報です。SigPhi はデジタル複製です。判明している刊行年・出版社・翻訳者を記載し、年が不明の場合は「n.d.」と示します。
何についての本か
『女性の選挙権』（一八五一年）。
背景と歴史
『ウェストミンスター・レヴュー』に無署名で発表され、長らくジョン・ステュアート・ミルの作とされてきた。ミルは彼女の夫であり、書いたのは彼女だとつねに言っていた。選挙権とあらゆる職業への道を要求し、女性の従属は自然のものではなく慣習のものだと論じている。ミルの『女性の隷従』より十八年早い。
これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。
When a prejudice, which has any hold on the feelings, finds itself reduced to the unpleasant necessity of assigning reasons, it thinks it has done enough when it has re-asserted the very point in dispute, in phrases which appeal to the pre-existing feeling. Thus, many persons think they have sufficiently justified the restrictions on women's field of action, when they have said that the pursuits from which women are excluded are unfeminine, and that the proper sphere of women is not politics or publicity, but private and domestic life. We deny the right of any portion of the species to decide for another portion, or any individual for another individual, what is and what is not their "proper sphere." The proper sphere for all human beings is the largest and highest which they are able to attain to. What this is, cannot be ascertained, without complete liberty of choice. The speakers at the Convention in America have, therefore, done wisely and right, in refusing to entertain the question of the peculiar aptitudes either of women or of men, or the limits within which this or that occupation may be supposed to be more adapted to the one or to the other. They justly maintain, that these questions can only be satisfactorily answered by perfect freedom. Let every occupation be open to all, without favor or discouragement to any, and employments will fall into the hands of those men or women who are found by experience to be most capable of worthily exercising them. There need be no fear that women will take out of the hands of men any occupation which men perform better than they. Each individual will prove his or her capacities, in the only way in which capacities can be proved—by trial; and the world will have the benefit of the best faculties of all its inhabitants.…