SigPhiSigPhi

創造的進化

アンリ・ベルクソン

言語:
英語
状態:
完全な作品
著者性:
著者自身による
テキストの状態:
良好なテキスト · 判読できない箇所 10 件は回答から除外しています
分量:
約 180,000 語 · 844
この作品を引用
  • APAアンリ・ベルクソン. (n.d.). 創造的進化. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/henri-bergson/creative-evolution
  • MLAアンリ・ベルクソン. "創造的進化." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/henri-bergson/creative-evolution.
  • Chicagoアンリ・ベルクソン. 創造的進化. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/henri-bergson/creative-evolution.

何についての本か

進化は偶然によっても、あらかじめ定められた計画によっても説明されず、さまざまな道を試しながら分岐してゆく一つの衝動——「生の飛躍」——によって説明される、というベルクソンの提案。

背景と歴史

一九〇七年刊。哲学の外で絶大な成功を収め、彼を著名人にした。一九二七年にはノーベル文学賞を受けている。もっともよく持ちこたえたのは「生の飛躍」ではない。生物学がそれを受け入れることはついになかった。持ちこたえたのは、知性が時間をどう作り上げるかについての批判である。行動のために作られた思考は、持続を静止した瞬間の連なりへと変えてしまい、それゆえ変化しつつあるものを思考できない、とベルクソンは論じる。

これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。

冒頭
The history of the evolution of life, incomplete as it yet is, already reveals to us how the intellect has been formed, by an uninterrupted progress, along a line which ascends through the vertebrate series up to man. It shows us in the faculty of understanding an appendage of the faculty of acting, a more and more precise, more and more complex and supple adaptation of the consciousness of living beings to the conditions of existence that are made for them. Hence should result this consequence that our intellect, in the narrow sense of the word, is intended to secure the perfect fitting of our body to its environment, to represent the relations of external things among themselves--in short, to think matter. Such will indeed be one of the conclusions of the present essay. We shall see that the human intellect feels at home among inanimate objects, more especially among solids, where our action finds its fulcrum and our industry its tools; that our concepts have been formed on the model of solids; that our logic is, pre-eminently, the logic of solids; that, consequently, our intellect triumphs in geometry, wherein is revealed the kinship of logical thought with unorganized matter, and where the intellect has only to follow its natural movement, after the lightest possible contact with experience, in order to go from discovery to discovery, sure that experience is following behind it and will justify it invariably. But from this it must also follow that our thought, in its purely logical form, is incapable of presenting the true nature of life, the full meaning of the evolutionary movement. Created by life, in definite circumstances, to act on definite things, how can it embrace life, of which it is only an emanation or an aspect? Deposited by the evolutionary movement in the course of its way, how can it be applied to the evolutionary movement itself?…

全文を読む →

← アンリ・ベルクソンに戻る