純粋理性批判
- 言語:
- 英語
- 状態:
- 完全な作品
- 著者性:
- 著者自身による
- テキストの状態:
- スキャンのノイズは検出されていません (全文に対する自動測定で、人の目では確認していません)
- 分量:
- 約 230,000 語 · 1,082 節
この作品を引用
- APAイマヌエル・カント. (n.d.). The Critique of Pure Reason [純粋理性批判]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/immanuel-kant/the-critique-of-pure-reason
- MLAイマヌエル・カント. The Critique of Pure Reason [純粋理性批判]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/immanuel-kant/the-critique-of-pure-reason.
- Chicagoイマヌエル・カント. The Critique of Pure Reason [純粋理性批判]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/immanuel-kant/the-critique-of-pure-reason.
収録版の書誌情報です。SigPhi はデジタル複製です。判明している刊行年・出版社・翻訳者を記載し、年が不明の場合は「n.d.」と示します。
何についての本か
認識は経験を超えて及びうるかという問いと、及びえないという答え。空間・時間・カテゴリーは、われわれが世界を受け取る仕方であって、世界そのものの性質ではない。
背景と歴史
版は一七八一年と一七八七年の二つがあり、内容は完全には一致しない。カントは先験的演繹を書き直し、合理的心理学の批判を作り替えた。だからこそ版に応じて「A」頁「B」頁で引用し、まともな翻訳は欄外に両方の頁付けを併記する。A も B も付されていない『純粋理性批判』の引用は、確かめようがない。
これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。
Time was, when she was the _queen_ of all the sciences; and, if we take the will for the deed, she certainly deserves, so far as regards the high importance of her object-matter, this title of honour. Now, it is the fashion of the time to heap contempt and scorn upon her; and the matron mourns, forlorn and forsaken, like Hecuba: Modo maxima rerum, Tot generis, natisque potens... Nunc trahor exul, inops. —Ovid, Metamorphoses. xiii At first, her government, under the administration of the _dogmatists_, was an absolute _despotism_. But, as the legislative continued to show traces of the ancient barbaric rule, her empire gradually broke up, and intestine wars introduced the reign of _anarchy;_ while the _sceptics_, like nomadic tribes, who hate a permanent habitation and settled mode of living, attacked from time to time those who had organized themselves into civil communities. But their number was, very happily, small; and thus they could not entirely put a stop to the exertions of those who persisted in raising new edifices, although on no settled or uniform plan. In recent times the hope dawned upon us of seeing those disputes settled, and the legitimacy of her claims established by a kind of _physiology_ of the human understanding—that of the celebrated Locke. But it was found that—although it was affirmed that this so-called queen could not refer her descent to any higher source than that of common experience, a circumstance which necessarily brought suspicion on her claims—as this _genealogy_ was incorrect, she persisted in the advancement of her claims to sovereignty. Thus metaphysics necessarily fell back into the antiquated and rotten constitution of _dogmatism_, and again became obnoxious to the contempt from which efforts had been made to save it.…