人倫の形而上学
- 言語:
- 英語
- 状態:
- 完全な作品
- 著者性:
- 著者自身による
- テキストの状態:
- 良好なテキスト
- 分量:
- 約 13,900 語 · 66 節
この作品を引用
- APAイマヌエル・カント. (n.d.). 人倫の形而上学. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/immanuel-kant/the-metaphysical-elements-of-ethics
- MLAイマヌエル・カント. "人倫の形而上学." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/immanuel-kant/the-metaphysical-elements-of-ethics.
- Chicagoイマヌエル・カント. 人倫の形而上学. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/immanuel-kant/the-metaphysical-elements-of-ethics.
何についての本か
『人倫の形而上学』の後半。自分に対する義務と他人に対する義務を、細かく。
背景と歴史
最も読まれていないカントであり、最も意外なカントでもある。ここで彼は原理から降りて個々の場合へ——嘘、貪欲、卑屈、友情——と入っていき、彼の倫理学が地面に触れたときに実際どう働くのかが見える。 これは古い英訳で、パブリックドメインである。ドイツ語の原本も目録にあり、引用はそちらによるべきである。
これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。
If there exists on any subject a philosophy (that is, a system of rational knowledge based on concepts), then there must also be for this philosophy a system of pure rational concepts, independent of any condition of intuition, in other words, a metaphysic. It may be asked whether metaphysical elements are required also for every practical philosophy, which is the doctrine of duties, and therefore also for Ethics, in order to be able to present it as a true science (systematically), not merely as an aggregate of separate doctrines (fragmentarily). As regards pure jurisprudence, no one will question this requirement; for it concerns only what is formal in the elective will, which has to be limited in its external relations according to laws of freedom; without regarding any end which is the matter of this will. Here, therefore, deontology is a mere scientific doctrine (doctrina scientiae). * * One who is acquainted with practical philosophy is not, therefore, a practical philosopher. The latter is he who makes the rational end the principle of his actions, while at the same time he joins with this the necessary knowledge which, as it aims at action, must not be spun out into the most subtile threads of metaphysic, unless a legal duty is in question; in which case meum and tuum must be accurately determined in the balance of justice, on the principle of equality of action and action, which requires something like mathematical proportion, but not in the case of a mere ethical duty.…