認識論 (ed. 2)
- 言語:
- 英語
- 状態:
- 完全な作品
- 著者性:
- 著者自身による
- テキストの状態:
- スキャンのノイズは検出されていません (全文に対する自動測定で、人の目では確認していません)
- 分量:
- 約 15,200 語 · 72 節
この作品を引用
- APAヨハン・ゴットリープ・フィヒテ. (n.d.). Concerning the Conception of the Science of Knowledge Generally [認識論 (ed. 2)]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/johann-fichte/concerning-the-conception-of-the-science-of-knowledge-generally
- MLAヨハン・ゴットリープ・フィヒテ. Concerning the Conception of the Science of Knowledge Generally [認識論 (ed. 2)]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/johann-fichte/concerning-the-conception-of-the-science-of-knowledge-generally.
- Chicagoヨハン・ゴットリープ・フィヒテ. Concerning the Conception of the Science of Knowledge Generally [認識論 (ed. 2)]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/johann-fichte/concerning-the-conception-of-the-science-of-knowledge-generally.
収録版の書誌情報です。SigPhi はデジタル複製です。判明している刊行年・出版社・翻訳者を記載し、年が不明の場合は「n.d.」と示します。
何についての本か
『知識学の概念について』（一七九四年）。体系そのものの前に置かれた、体系の綱領。
背景と歴史
フィヒテは自分が何をするつもりかを告げるためにこの短い文章を出した。ただ一つの原理——自我の活動——から全体を演繹する哲学である。『知識学』への入口だが、その『知識学』のほうは十度あまり書き直され、彼自身が満足できるところまでは一度も行かなかった。 古い英訳である。目録にはドイツ語のフィヒテもあり、引用は原文によるべきである。
これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。
No proposition is possible without content or without form. It must contain something whereof we know, and something which is known thereof. Hence, the first principle of the science of knowledge must have both content and form. Now, this first principle is to be immediately and of itself certain, and this can only signify: its content must determine its form, and its form its content. Its form can only fit its content, and its content can only fit its form; every other form connected with that content, or every other content connected with that form, would cancel that principle itself, and thus annihilate all knowledge. Hence, the form of the absolute first principle of the science of knowledge is not only contained in that principle itself, but is also presented as absolutely valid for the content of that principle. Again: if there should be, besides this absolute first principle, still other fundamental principles of the science of knowledge—which in that case can only be partly absolute, and must be partly derived from the first principle, since otherwise in the first case they would not be fundamental principles, and in the latter case not connected with the first and highest principle—then the absolute part of these other fundamental principles could only be either the content or the form; and, likewise, the conditioned or derived part of these principles could only be either the content or the form. If the content of these other fundamental principles be their absolute or unconditioned part, then the absolute first principle of the science of knowledge must condition the form of those contents; or if the form of those other principles be the unconditioned part, then their content must be conditioned by the first principle of the science of knowledge; and thus indirectly also their form, that is, in so far as the form is to be form of the content.…