SigPhiSigPhi

道徳の系譜

ニーチェ

言語:
英語
状態:
完全な作品
著者性:
著者自身による
テキストの状態:
良好なテキスト
分量:
約 59,600 語 · 283
この作品を引用
  • APAニーチェ. (n.d.). 道徳の系譜. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/nietzsche/the-genealogy-of-morals
  • MLAニーチェ. "道徳の系譜." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/nietzsche/the-genealogy-of-morals.
  • Chicagoニーチェ. 道徳の系譜. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/nietzsche/the-genealogy-of-morals.

何についての本か

『道徳の系譜』(一八八七年)。善と、罪責と、禁欲の理想が本当はどこから来たのかについての三つの論考。

背景と歴史

最も体系的な本であり、後世の哲学に最も大きく影響した本でもある。フーコーは系譜学の方法をまるごとここから取った。中心の主張——「善い」は「無私の」を意味する前に「高貴な」を意味しており、その転換はルサンチマンの仕事である——は議論の余地があるが、その問い方がすべてを変えた。 オスカー・レヴィ編の全集(一九〇九—一九一三年)からの英訳で、パブリックドメインにあるものである。一世紀以上前のもので、それは読めばわかる。原文はドイツ語であり、引用は原文によるべきである。目録にあるドイツ語の原本は『ツァラトゥストラはこう言った』と『権力への意志』の二つだけで、ほかは翻訳しかない。

これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。

冒頭
We are unknown, we knowers, ourselves to ourselves: this has its own good reason. We have never searched for ourselves--how should it then come to pass, that we should ever _find_ ourselves? Rightly has it been said: "Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also." _Our_ treasure is there, where stand the hives of our knowledge. It is to those hives that we are always striving; as born creatures of flight, and as the honey-gatherers of the spirit, we care really in our hearts only for one thing--to bring something "home to the hive!" As far as the rest of life with its so-called "experiences" is concerned, which of us has even sufficient serious interest? or sufficient time? In our dealings with such points of life, we are, I fear, never properly to the point; to be precise, our heart is not there, and certainly not our ear. Rather like one who, delighting in a divine distraction, or sunken in the seas of his own soul, in whose ear the clock has just thundered with all its force its twelve strokes of noon, suddenly wakes up, and asks himself, "What has in point of fact just struck?" so do we at times rub afterwards, as it were, our puzzled ears, and ask in complete astonishment and complete embarrassment, "Through what have we in point of fact just lived?" further, "Who are we in point of fact?" and count, _after they have struck_, as I have explained, all the twelve throbbing beats of the clock of our experience, of our life, of our being--ah!--and count wrong in the endeavour. Of necessity we remain strangers to ourselves, we understand ourselves not, in ourselves we are bound to be mistaken, for of us holds good to all eternity the motto, "Each one is the farthest away from himself"--as far as ourselves are concerned we are not "knowers." 2.…

全文を読む →

← ニーチェに戻る