ピエール・ジョゼフ・プルードン
- 言語:
- 英語
- 状態:
- 完全な作品
- 著者性:
- 著者自身による
- テキストの状態:
- スキャンのノイズは検出されていません (全文に対する自動測定で、人の目では確認していません)
- 分量:
- 約 180,000 語 · 844 節
この作品を引用
- APAプルードン. (n.d.). What is Property? An Inquiry into the Principle of Right and of Government [ピエール・ジョゼフ・プルードン]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/proudhon/what-is-property-an-inquiry-into-the-principle-of-right-and-of-government
- MLAプルードン. What is Property? An Inquiry into the Principle of Right and of Government [ピエール・ジョゼフ・プルードン]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/proudhon/what-is-property-an-inquiry-into-the-principle-of-right-and-of-government.
- Chicagoプルードン. What is Property? An Inquiry into the Principle of Right and of Government [ピエール・ジョゼフ・プルードン]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/proudhon/what-is-property-an-inquiry-into-the-principle-of-right-and-of-government.
SigPhi が再現している版の参照です。SigPhi はそのデジタル再現であり、出版者ではありません。版の刊行年はメタデータにないため「n.d.」とし、訳者は記録がある場合のみ記します。
何についての本か
表題の問いで始まり、以来つねに引かれてきたあの一文でそれに答える書——所有とは盗みである。
背景と歴史
一八四〇年刊。この一文には、書物自身が加えていながら、引用にはほとんど添えられない限定がある。プルードンが攻撃するのは占有ではない。自分が働きかけたものを用いる権利ではなく、働きかけずに物から収入を得る権利としての所有、すなわち地代と利子である。また、自らをアナーキストと呼び、その語を引き受けた最初の書物でもある。マルクスは刊行時にこれを称賛し、七年後には厳しく攻撃した。その攻撃の書もまた本目録に収められている。
これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。
There are those to whom letter-writing is a bore, and who, assailed with questions and compliments, reply in the greatest haste, solely that the job may be over with, and who return politeness for politeness, mingling it with more or less wit. This kind of correspondence, though coming from celebrated people, is insignificant and unworthy of collection and classification. "After those who write letters in performance of a disagreeable duty, and almost side by side with them in point of insignificance, I should put those who write in a manner wholly external, wholly superficial, devoted only to flattery, lavishing praise like gold, without counting it; and those also who weigh every word, who reply formally and pompously, with a view to fine phrases and effects. They exchange words only, and choose them solely for their brilliancy and show. You think it is you, individually, to whom they speak; but they are addressing themselves in your person to the four corners of Europe. Such letters are empty, and teach as nothing but theatrical execution and the favorite pose of their writers. "I will not class among the latter the more prudent and sagacious authors who, when writing to individuals, keep one eye on posterity. We know that many who pursue this method have written long, finished, charming, flattering, and tolerably natural letters. Beranger furnishes us with the best example of this class. "Proudhon, however, is a man of entirely different nature and habits. In writing, he thinks of nothing but his idea and the person whom he addresses: ad rem et ad hominem. A man of conviction and doctrine, to write does not weary him; to be questioned does not annoy him.…