ショーペンハウアー随筆集
- 言語:
- 英語
- 状態:
- 完全な作品
- 著者性:
- 著者自身による
- テキストの状態:
- 良好なテキスト
- 分量:
- 約 76,400 語 · 363 節
この作品を引用
- APAアルトゥル・ショーペンハウアー. (n.d.). ショーペンハウアー随筆集. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/schopenhauer/essays-of-schopenhauer
- MLAアルトゥル・ショーペンハウアー. "ショーペンハウアー随筆集." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/schopenhauer/essays-of-schopenhauer.
- Chicagoアルトゥル・ショーペンハウアー. ショーペンハウアー随筆集. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/schopenhauer/essays-of-schopenhauer.
何についての本か
ショーペンハウアーの論考の英語選集。女性について、騒音について、教育について、自殺について、文体について。
背景と歴史
随筆家としてのショーペンハウアーは、『意志と表象としての世界』の体系家よりも鋭く、そしてはるかに読みやすい。 版についての注意：『Essays of Schopenhauer』は、ショーペンハウアーがその書名で書いた本ではない。英語の編者が『余録と補遺』（一八五一年）から章を選び出し、自分で題をつけたものである。本文はショーペンハウアーのものだが、本のほうはそうではない。 これは古い英訳で、パブリックドメインにある。ドイツ語の原本も目録にあり、引用はそちらによるべきである。
これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。
SHORT DIALOGUE ON THE INDESTRUCTIBILITY OF OUR TRUE BEING BY DEATH RELIGION--A DIALOGUE PSYCHOLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS METAPHYSICS OF LOVE PHYSIOGNOMY ON SUICIDE PRELIMINARY. When Schopenhauer was asked where he wished to be buried, he answered, "Anywhere; they will find me;" and the stone that marks his grave at Frankfort bears merely the inscription "Arthur Schopenhauer," without even the date of his birth or death. Schopenhauer, the pessimist, had a sufficiently optimistic conviction that his message to the world would ultimately be listened to--a conviction that never failed him during a lifetime of disappointments, of neglect in quarters where perhaps he would have most cherished appreciation; a conviction that only showed some signs of being justified a few years before his death. Schopenhauer was no opportunist; he was not even conciliatory; he never hesitated to declare his own faith in himself, in his principles, in his philosophy; he did not ask to be listened to as a matter of courtesy but as a right--a right for which he would struggle, for which he fought, and which has in the course of time, it may be admitted, been conceded to him. Although everything that Schopenhauer wrote was written more or less as evidence to support his main philosophical thesis, his unifying philosophical principle, the essays in this volume have an interest, if not altogether apart, at least of a sufficiently independent interest to enable them to be considered on their own merits, without relation to his main idea. And in dissociating them, if one may do so for a moment (their author would have scarcely permitted it!…