意志と表象としての世界 (II)
- 言語:
- 英語
- 状態:
- 完全な作品
- 著者性:
- 著者自身による
- テキストの状態:
- スキャンのノイズは検出されていません (全文に対する自動測定で、人の目では確認していません)
- 分量:
- 約 180,000 語 · 862 節
この作品を引用
- APAアルトゥル・ショーペンハウアー. (n.d.). The World as Will and Idea (Vol. 2 of 3) [意志と表象としての世界 (II)]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/schopenhauer/the-world-as-will-and-idea-vol-2-of-3
- MLAアルトゥル・ショーペンハウアー. The World as Will and Idea (Vol. 2 of 3) [意志と表象としての世界 (II)]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/schopenhauer/the-world-as-will-and-idea-vol-2-of-3.
- Chicagoアルトゥル・ショーペンハウアー. The World as Will and Idea (Vol. 2 of 3) [意志と表象としての世界 (II)]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/schopenhauer/the-world-as-will-and-idea-vol-2-of-3.
SigPhi が再現している版の参照です。SigPhi はそのデジタル再現であり、出版者ではありません。版の刊行年はメタデータにないため「n.d.」とし、訳者は記録がある場合のみ記します。
何についての本か
第二冊。著作の続きであり、表象としての世界から意志としての世界への移行を扱う。
背景と歴史
この英訳は、ドイツ語では二巻であるものを三冊に配分している。一八一八年の本体と、二十六年後の一八四四年にショーペンハウアーが加えた補遺の巻である。補遺は付け足しの類ではない。本体と同じ長さがあり、彼の思想はしばしばそちらのほうがよく読める。もはや構成そのものを誰かに納得させる必要がないところで書いているからだ。彼自身、全体を二度読むよう求めていた。
これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。
of the general public was aroused. Induced by this, but not urged by inward inclination and sense of power (which find utterance even at unfavourable times, as in the case of Spinoza), men without any exceptional talent made various weak, absurd, and indeed sometimes insane, attempts, to which, however, the now interested public gave its attention, and with great patience, such as is only found in Germany, long lent its ear. The same thing must once have happened in Nature, when a great revolution had altered the whole surface of the earth, land and sea had changed places, and the scene was cleared for a new creation. It was then a long time before Nature could produce a new series of lasting forms all in harmony with themselves and with each other. Strange and monstrous organisations appeared which did not harmonise either with themselves or with each other, and therefore could not endure long, but whose still existing remains have brought down to us the tokens of that wavering and tentative procedure of Nature forming itself anew. Since, now, in philosophy, a crisis precisely similar to this, and an age of fearful abortions, was, as we all know, introduced by Kant, it may be concluded that the services he rendered were not complete, but must have been negative and one-sided, and burdened with great defects. These defects we now desire to search out. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ First of all we shall present to ourselves clearly and examine the fundamental thought in which the aim of the whole “Critique of Pure Reason” lies. Kant placed himself at the standpoint of his predecessors, the dogmatic philosophers, and accordingly he started with them from the following assumptions:—(1.) Metaphysics is the science of that which lies beyond the possibility of all experience. (2.…