SigPhiSigPhi

トマス・ペイン著作集 第2巻(1779-1792年):人間の権利

トーマス・ペイン

言語:
英語
状態:
完全な作品
著者性:
著者自身による
テキストの状態:
スキャン誤りあり (全文に対する自動測定で、人の目では確認していません) · 判読できない箇所 1 件は回答から除外しています
分量:
約 97,100 語 · 461 節
この作品を引用
  • APAトーマス・ペイン. (n.d.). The Writings of Thomas Paine — Volume 2 (1779-1792) The Rights of Man [トマス・ペイン著作集 第2巻(1779-1792年):人間の権利]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/thomas-paine/the-writings-of-thomas-paine-volume-2-1779-1792-the-rights-of-man
  • MLAトーマス・ペイン. The Writings of Thomas Paine — Volume 2 (1779-1792) The Rights of Man [トマス・ペイン著作集 第2巻(1779-1792年):人間の権利]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/thomas-paine/the-writings-of-thomas-paine-volume-2-1779-1792-the-rights-of-man.
  • Chicagoトーマス・ペイン. The Writings of Thomas Paine — Volume 2 (1779-1792) The Rights of Man [トマス・ペイン著作集 第2巻(1779-1792年):人間の権利]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/thomas-paine/the-writings-of-thomas-paine-volume-2-1779-1792-the-rights-of-man.

収録版の書誌情報です。SigPhi はデジタル複製です。判明している刊行年・出版社・翻訳者を記載し、年が不明の場合は「n.d.」と示します。

何についての本か

著作集第二巻(一七七九—一七九二年)。『人間の権利』。

背景と歴史

フランス革命についてのバークへの返答であり、それだけではない。老齢年金、公教育、累進課税を、それらが実際に現れる一世紀半前に提案している。彼はイングランドで扇動の罪に問われ、逃げねばならなかった。注記:目録には四巻すべてと、全集版 Writings も収められている。

これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。

収録版からの抜粋
he says, "bind us" (meaning the people of their day), "our heirs and our posterity, to them, their heirs and posterity, to the end of time." Mr. Burke conceives his point sufficiently established by producing those clauses, which he enforces by saying that they exclude the right of the nation for ever. And not yet content with making such declarations, repeated over and over again, he farther says, "that if the people of England possessed such a right before the Revolution" (which he acknowledges to have been the case, not only in England, but throughout Europe, at an early period), "yet that the English Nation did, at the time of the Revolution, most solemnly renounce and abdicate it, for themselves, and for all their posterity, for ever." As Mr. Burke occasionally applies the poison drawn from his horrid principles, not only to the English nation, but to the French Revolution and the National Assembly, and charges that august, illuminated and illuminating body of men with the epithet of usurpers, I shall, sans ceremonie, place another system of principles in opposition to his. The English Parliament of 1688 did a certain thing, which, for themselves and their constituents, they had a right to do, and which it appeared right should be done. But, in addition to this right, which they possessed by delegation, they set up another right by assumption, that of binding and controlling posterity to the end of time. The case, therefore, divides itself into two parts; the right which they possessed by delegation, and the right which they set up by assumption. The first is admitted; but with respect to the second, I reply: There never did, there never will, and there never can, exist a Parliament, or any description of men, or any generation of men, in any country, possessed of the right or the power of binding and controlling posterity to the "end of time," or of commanding for ever how the world shall be governed, or who shall govern it; and…

この版を読む →

← トーマス・ペインに戻る