SigPhiSigPhi

The Varieties of Religious Experience A Study in Human Nature

ウィリアム・ジェームズ

言語:
英語
状態:
完全な作品
著者性:
著者自身による
テキストの状態:
スキャンのノイズは検出されていません (全文に対する自動測定で、人の目では確認していません)
分量:
約 200,000 語 · 952 節
この作品を引用
  • APAウィリアム・ジェームズ. (n.d.). The Varieties of Religious Experience A Study in Human Nature. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/william-james/the-varieties-of-religious-experience-a-study-in-human-nature
  • MLAウィリアム・ジェームズ. The Varieties of Religious Experience A Study in Human Nature. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/william-james/the-varieties-of-religious-experience-a-study-in-human-nature.
  • Chicagoウィリアム・ジェームズ. The Varieties of Religious Experience A Study in Human Nature. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/william-james/the-varieties-of-religious-experience-a-study-in-human-nature.

SigPhi が再現している版の参照です。SigPhi はそのデジタル再現であり、出版者ではありません。版の刊行年はメタデータにないため「n.d.」とし、訳者は記録がある場合のみ記します。

何についての本か

一九〇一〜〇二年のジェイムズのギフォード講義。回心、聖性、神秘体験、そして「病める魂」を、当事者の証言に基づいて考察する。

背景と歴史

この書を成り立たせているのは選択の原理だ。ジェイムズは個人の経験だけを——人がひとりでいるときに起こることだけを——見ると決め、制度も教義も教会も脇に置く。この選択が多くを取りこぼすことは、彼自身が認めている。さらに、ありふれた事例ではなく極端な事例を選ぶ。極端においてこそ現象がよく見える、というのである。彼はそれを明言している。だからこそ読者は、何が入れられ何が入れられなかったかを正確に知ったうえで、この書と論じ合うことができる。

これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。

冒頭
religious feelings and religious impulses must be its subject, and I must confine myself to those more developed subjective phenomena recorded in literature produced by articulate and fully self‐conscious men, in works of piety and autobiography. Interesting as the origins and early stages of a subject always are, yet when one seeks earnestly for its full significance, one must always look to its more completely evolved and perfect forms. It follows from this that the documents that will most concern us will be those of the men who were most accomplished in the religious life and best able to give an intelligible account of their ideas and motives. These men, of course, are either comparatively modern writers, or else such earlier ones as have become religious classics. The _documents humains_ which we shall find most instructive need not then be sought for in the haunts of special erudition—they lie along the beaten highway; and this circumstance, which flows so naturally from the character of our problem, suits admirably also your lecturer’s lack of special theological learning. I may take my citations, my sentences and paragraphs of personal confession, from books that most of you at some time will have had already in your hands, and yet this will be no detriment to the value of my conclusions. It is true that some more adventurous reader and investigator, lecturing here in future, may unearth from the shelves of libraries documents that will make a more delectable and curious entertainment to listen to than mine. Yet I doubt whether he will necessarily, by his control of so much more out‐of‐the‐way material, get much closer to the essence of the matter in hand. The question, What are the religious propensities? and the question, What is their philosophic significance?…

全文を読む →

← ウィリアム・ジェームズに戻る