Utilitarianism
- Язык:
- английский
- Статус:
- Полное произведение
- Авторство:
- Написано автором
- Состояние текста:
- Чистый текст
- Объём:
- ~28 800 слов · 137 фрагментов
Процитировать это произведение
- APAДжон Стюарт Милль. (n.d.). Utilitarianism. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ru/works/john-stuart-mill/utilitarianism
- MLAДжон Стюарт Милль. "Utilitarianism." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ru/works/john-stuart-mill/utilitarianism.
- ChicagoДжон Стюарт Милль. Utilitarianism. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ru/works/john-stuart-mill/utilitarianism.
О чём это
«Утилитаризм» (1861): самая известная защита начала наибольшего счастья.
Контекст и история
Милль поправляет Бентама в решающем месте: удовольствия не одинаковы, есть высшие и низшие, и «лучше быть недовольным Сократом, чем довольным дураком». С этой фразы утилитаризм перестаёт быть арифметикой.
Редакционный контекст, а не источник для цитирования: в отличие от отрывков самого произведения, эти сведения нельзя проверить по корпусу.
CHAPTER III. OF THE ULTIMATE SANCTION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF UTILITY CHAPTER IV. OF WHAT SORT OF PROOF THE PRINCIPLE OF UTILITY IS SUSCEPTIBLE CHAPTER V. OF THE CONNEXION BETWEEN JUSTICE AND UTILITY UTILITARIANISM. CHAPTER I. GENERAL REMARKS. There are few circumstances among those which make up the present condition of human knowledge, more unlike what might have been expected, or more significant of the backward state in which speculation on the most important subjects still lingers, than the little progress which has been made in the decision of the controversy respecting the criterion of right and wrong. From the dawn of philosophy, the question concerning the _summum bonum_, or, what is the same thing, concerning the foundation of morality, has been accounted the main problem in speculative thought, has occupied the most gifted intellects, and divided them into sects and schools, carrying on a vigorous warfare against one another. And after more than two thousand years the same discussions continue, philosophers are still ranged under the same contending banners, and neither thinkers nor mankind at large seem nearer to being unanimous on the subject, than when the youth Socrates listened to the old Protagoras, and asserted (if Plato's dialogue be grounded on a real conversation) the theory of utilitarianism against the popular morality of the so-called sophist. It is true that similar confusion and uncertainty, and in some cases similar discordance, exist respecting the first principles of all the sciences, not excepting that which is deemed the most certain of them, mathematics; without much impairing, generally indeed without impairing at all, the trustworthiness of the conclusions of those sciences.…