SigPhiSigPhi

An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding

デイヴィッド・ヒューム

言語:
英語
状態:
完全な作品
著者性:
著者自身による
テキストの状態:
スキャンのノイズは検出されていません (全文に対する自動測定で、人の目では確認していません)
分量:
約 62,300 語 · 296 節
この作品を引用
  • APAデイヴィッド・ヒューム. (n.d.). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/david-hume/an-enquiry-concerning-human-understanding
  • MLAデイヴィッド・ヒューム. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/david-hume/an-enquiry-concerning-human-understanding.
  • Chicagoデイヴィッド・ヒューム. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/david-hume/an-enquiry-concerning-human-understanding.

収録版の書誌情報です。SigPhi はデジタル複製です。判明している刊行年・出版社・翻訳者を記載し、年が不明の場合は「n.d.」と示します。

何についての本か

精神は観念をどこから得るのか。いかなる権利で原因と結果を結びつけるのか。ヒュームの答えは——理性ではなく習慣——であり、この問いに耐えられぬ形而上学はすべて炎に投じよと呼びかける。

背景と歴史

1748年出版。二十代で書いた『人間本性論』——本人の言葉では「印刷機から死産で落ちた」——を、円熟した簡潔さで書き直したものである。因果性の分析と奇跡への批判はこの書を醜聞とし、その散文は古典となった。そして考えうる限り最も重大な読者を得た。カントは、ヒュームが自分を「独断のまどろみ」から覚ましたと書いている——この書がなければ、我々の知る『純粋理性批判』は存在しなかった。

これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。

収録版からの抜粋
abstract, and even unintelligible to common readers, they aim at the approbation of the learned and the wise; and think themselves sufficiently compensated for the labour of their whole lives, if they can discover some hidden truths, which may contribute to the instruction of posterity. 3. It is certain that the easy and obvious philosophy will always, with the generality of mankind, have the preference above the accurate and abstruse; and by many will be recommended, not only as more agreeable, but more useful than the other. It enters more into common life; moulds the heart and affections; and, by touching those principles which actuate men, reforms their conduct, and brings them nearer to that model of perfection which it describes. On the contrary, the abstruse philosophy, being founded on a turn of mind, which cannot enter into business and action, vanishes when the philosopher leaves the shade, and comes into open day; nor can its principles easily retain any influence over our conduct and behaviour. The feelings of our heart, the agitation of our passions, the vehemence of our affections, dissipate all its conclusions, and reduce the profound philosopher to a mere plebeian. 4. This also must be confessed, that the most durable, as well as justest fame, has been acquired by the easy philosophy, and that abstract reasoners seem hitherto to have enjoyed only a momentary reputation, from the caprice or ignorance of their own age, but have not been able to support their renown with more equitable posterity. It is easy for a profound philosopher to commit a mistake in his subtile reasonings; and one mistake is the necessary parent of another, while he pushes on his consequences, and is not deterred from embracing any conclusion, by its unusual appearance, or its contradiction to popular opinion.…

この版を読む →

本書の主題

← デイヴィッド・ヒュームに戻る