SigPhiSigPhi

论自由

约翰·斯图尔特·密尔

语言:
英语
状态:
完整作品
作者归属:
作者本人所著
文本状况:
未检测到扫描噪点 (对全文的自动评估,未经人工核对)
篇幅:
约 55,200 词 · 262 个段落
引用本作品
  • APA约翰·斯图尔特·密尔. (n.d.). On Liberty [论自由]. The Walter Scott Publishing Co.. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/john-stuart-mill/on-liberty
  • MLA约翰·斯图尔特·密尔. On Liberty [论自由]. The Walter Scott Publishing Co.. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/john-stuart-mill/on-liberty.
  • Chicago约翰·斯图尔特·密尔. On Liberty [论自由]. The Walter Scott Publishing Co.. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/zh/works/john-stuart-mill/on-liberty.

本条目引用所收录的版本。SigPhi 是数字复制平台。已知的年份、出版者和译者均列出;“n.d.”表示年份未知。

内容简介

个人自由的经典辩护:违背一个人的意志对其行使权力,唯一正当的理由是防止他伤害他人——绝不是为了他自己的好处,也不是多数人的意见。

背景与流传

1859年出版,与《物种起源》同年。密尔与妻子哈丽特·泰勒共同构思此书,而她已于前一年去世;卷首献辞称此书一半属于她,他此后拒绝改动其中任何一行。令他忧虑的与其说是暴君,不如说是一种更新的威胁:民主社会中多数与习俗的暴政,对异见者的社会性窒息。至今关于言论自由的辩论,其框架正是这部著作奠定的。

这是编辑性背景,不是可引用的来源:与作品本身的段落不同,这些说明无法在语料库中核对。

所收版本的节选 — W. L. Courtney — Introduction
years were very much influenced by his friendship and correspondence with Comte, a curious comradeship between men of such different temperament. In 1848 Mill published his _Political Economy_, to which he had given his serious study since the completion of his _Logic_. His articles and reviews, though they involved a good deal of work--as, for instance, the re-perusal of the _Iliad_ and the _Odyssey_ in the original before reviewing Grote's _Greece_--were recreation to the student. The year 1856 saw him head of the Examiners' Office in the India House, and another two years brought the end of his official work, owing to the transfer of India to the Crown. In the same year his wife died. _Liberty_ was published shortly after, as well as the _Thoughts on Parliamentary Reform_, and no year passed without Mill making important contributions on the political, philosophical, and ethical questions of the day. Seven years after the death of his wife, Mill was invited to contest Westminster. His feeling on the conduct of elections made him refuse to take any personal action in the matter, and he gave the frankest expression to his political views, but nevertheless he was elected by a large majority. He was not a conventional success in the House; as a speaker he lacked magnetism. But his influence was widely felt. "For the sake of the House of Commons at large," said Mr. Gladstone, "I rejoiced …

阅读此版本 →

本书的主题

← 返回约翰·斯图尔特·密尔