SigPhiSigPhi

Moral Letters to Lucilius (Epistulae Morales)

लुसियस अन्नायस सेनेका

भाषा:
अंग्रेज़ी
अनुवाद:
Richard M. Gummere
स्थिति:
संपूर्ण कृति
लेखकत्व:
लेखक द्वारा लिखित
पाठ की स्थिति:
स्कैन की कोई गड़बड़ी नहीं मिली (पूरे पाठ पर स्वचालित माप, हाथ से जाँचा नहीं गया)
विस्तार:
~2,40,000 शब्द · 1,135 अंश
इस कृति का हवाला दें
  • APAलुसियस अन्नायस सेनेका. (n.d.). Moral Letters to Lucilius (Epistulae Morales) (Richard M. Gummere, Trans.). Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/hi/works/seneca/moral-letters-to-lucilius-epistulae-morales
  • MLAलुसियस अन्नायस सेनेका. Moral Letters to Lucilius (Epistulae Morales). Translated by Richard M. Gummere. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/hi/works/seneca/moral-letters-to-lucilius-epistulae-morales.
  • Chicagoलुसियस अन्नायस सेनेका. Moral Letters to Lucilius (Epistulae Morales). Translated by Richard M. Gummere. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/hi/works/seneca/moral-letters-to-lucilius-epistulae-morales.

यह उस संस्करण का संदर्भ है जिसे SigPhi पुनः प्रस्तुत करता है: SigPhi उसकी डिजिटल प्रति है, प्रकाशक नहीं। संस्करण का वर्ष मेटाडेटा में नहीं है (इसलिए «n.d.»), और अनुवादक तभी दिखाया जाता है जब वह दर्ज हो।

यह किस बारे में है

लुकीलियुस को लिखे एक सौ चौबीस पत्र, इस विषय पर कि जिया कैसे जाए: नष्ट होता समय, मृत्यु का भय, मैत्री, संपत्ति, और दर्शन में क्या ग्रहणीय है और क्या नहीं।

संदर्भ और इतिहास

इन्हें उन्होंने अपने अंतिम वर्षों में लिखा, नीरो के दरबार से हट जाने के बाद; उसी नीरो ने कुछ ही समय बाद उन्हें आत्महत्या के लिए विवश किया। ये पत्राचार जैसे दिखते हैं और संभवतः पूरी तरह वैसे हैं नहीं: सेनेका ने इन्हें प्रकाशन के लिए रचा, और पत्र-रूप एक युक्ति है — वह किसी छोटी, ठोस बात से आरंभ कर, ग्रंथ लिखे बिना, कहीं भी पहुँचने देता है। यही कारण है कि ये आज भी पढ़े जाते हैं, जबकि उनके औपचारिक ग्रंथ अधिक भारी पड़ते हैं।

यह संपादकीय संदर्भ है, उद्धरण-योग्य स्रोत नहीं: कृति के अंशों के विपरीत, इन कथनों की जाँच कॉर्पस में नहीं की जा सकती।

शुरुआत
after they have judged him. Ponder for a long time whether you shall admit a given person to your friendship; but when you have decided to admit him, welcome him with all your heart and soul. Speak as boldly with him as with yourself. As to yourself, although you should live in such a way that you trust your own self with nothing which you could not entrust even to your enemy, yet, since certain matters occur which convention keeps secret, you should share with a friend at least all your worries and reflections. Regard him as loyal, and you will make him loyal. Some, for example, fearing to be deceived, have taught men to deceive; by their suspicions they have given their friend the right to do wrong. Why need I keep back any words in the presence of my friend? Why should I not regard myself as alone when in his company? There is a class of men who communicate, to anyone whom they meet, matters which should be revealed to friends alone, and unload upon the chance listener whatever irks them. Others, again, fear to confide in their closest intimates; and if it were possible, they would not trust even themselves, burying their secrets deep in their hearts. But we should do neither. It is equally faulty to trust everyone and to trust no one. Yet the former fault is, I should say, the more ingenuous, the latter the more safe. In like manner you should rebuke these two kinds of men,—both those who always lack repose, and those who are always in repose. For love of bustle is not industry,—it is only the restlessness of a hunted mind. And true repose does not consist in condemning all motion as merely vexation; that kind of repose is slackness and inertia. Therefore, you should note the following saying, taken from my reading in Pomponius: “Some men shrink into dark corners, to such a degree that they see darkly by day.” No, men should combine these tendencies, and he who reposes should act and he who acts should take repose.…

पूरी कृति पढ़ें →

कृति के विषय

← लुसियस अन्नायस सेनेका पर वापस