SigPhiSigPhi

方法序説

デカルト

言語:
英語
状態:
完全な作品
著者性:
著者自身による
テキストの状態:
スキャンのノイズは検出されていません (全文に対する自動測定で、人の目では確認していません)
分量:
約 23,200 語 · 110 節
この作品を引用
  • APAデカルト. (n.d.). Discourse on the Method of Rightly Conducting One's Reason and of Seeking Truth [方法序説]. Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/descartes/discourse-on-the-method-of-rightly-conducting-one-s-reason-and-of-seeking-truth
  • MLAデカルト. Discourse on the Method of Rightly Conducting One's Reason and of Seeking Truth [方法序説]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/descartes/discourse-on-the-method-of-rightly-conducting-one-s-reason-and-of-seeking-truth.
  • Chicagoデカルト. Discourse on the Method of Rightly Conducting One's Reason and of Seeking Truth [方法序説]. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/descartes/discourse-on-the-method-of-rightly-conducting-one-s-reason-and-of-seeking-truth.

SigPhi が再現している版の参照です。SigPhi はそのデジタル再現であり、出版者ではありません。版の刊行年はメタデータにないため「n.d.」とし、訳者は記録がある場合のみ記します。

何についての本か

デカルトが学んだすべてを疑うと決意し、疑いに耐えて残ったただひとつの確実性——我思う、ゆえに我あり——から知識を建て直していく物語。

背景と歴史

1637年、ライデンで匿名により出版された。学者の言語ラテン語ではなくフランス語で書かれたのは、彼の言葉によれば「女性や学のない人々にも」読めるようにするためだった。もとは三つの科学論文(光学・気象学・幾何学)の序文だったが、序文が本文を呑み込んでしまった。執筆はオランダから——四年前にガリレイの身に起きたことを見て、デカルトは慎重に暮らしていた。近代哲学の出生証明書である。疑う自我を、すべての土台に据えたのだから。

これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。

冒頭
curious in the customs of the past are generally ignorant of those of the present. Besides, fictitious narratives lead us to imagine the possibility of many events that are impossible; and even the most faithful histories, if they do not wholly misrepresent matters, or exaggerate their importance to render the account of them more worthy of perusal, omit, at least, almost always the meanest and least striking of the attendant circumstances; hence it happens that the remainder does not represent the truth, and that such as regulate their conduct by examples drawn from this source, are apt to fall into the extravagances of the knight-errants of romance, and to entertain projects that exceed their powers. I esteemed eloquence highly, and was in raptures with poesy; but I thought that both were gifts of nature rather than fruits of study. Those in whom the faculty of reason is predominant, and who most skillfully dispose their thoughts with a view to render them clear and intelligible, are always the best able to persuade others of the truth of what they lay down, though they should speak only in the language of Lower Brittany, and be wholly ignorant of the rules of rhetoric; and those whose minds are stored with the most agreeable fancies, and who can give expression to them with the greatest embellishment and harmony, are still the best poets, though unacquainted with the art of poetry. I was especially delighted with the mathematics, on account of the certitude and evidence of their reasonings; but I had not as yet a precise knowledge of their true use; and thinking that they but contributed to the advancement of the mechanical arts, I was astonished that foundations, so strong and solid, should have had no loftier superstructure reared on them.…

全文を読む →

本書の主題

← デカルトに戻る