SigPhiSigPhi

方法序説

デカルト

言語:
英語
状態:
完全な作品
著者性:
著者自身による
テキストの状態:
良好なテキスト
分量:
約 23,200 語 · 110
この作品を引用
  • APAデカルト. (n.d.). 方法序説. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/descartes/discourse-on-the-method-of-rightly-conducting-one-s-reason-and-of-seeking-truth
  • MLAデカルト. "方法序説." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/descartes/discourse-on-the-method-of-rightly-conducting-one-s-reason-and-of-seeking-truth.
  • Chicagoデカルト. 方法序説. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/descartes/discourse-on-the-method-of-rightly-conducting-one-s-reason-and-of-seeking-truth.

何についての本か

デカルトが学んだすべてを疑うと決意し、疑いに耐えて残ったただひとつの確実性——我思う、ゆえに我あり——から知識を建て直していく物語。

背景と歴史

1637年、ライデンで匿名により出版された。学者の言語ラテン語ではなくフランス語で書かれたのは、彼の言葉によれば「女性や学のない人々にも」読めるようにするためだった。もとは三つの科学論文(光学・気象学・幾何学)の序文だったが、序文が本文を呑み込んでしまった。執筆はオランダから——四年前にガリレイの身に起きたことを見て、デカルトは慎重に暮らしていた。近代哲学の出生証明書である。疑う自我を、すべての土台に据えたのだから。

これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。

冒頭
If this Discourse appear too long to be read at once, it may be divided into six Parts: and, in the first, will be found various considerations touching the Sciences; in the second, the principal rules of the Method which the Author has discovered, in the third, certain of the rules of Morals which he has deduced from this Method; in the fourth, the reasonings by which he establishes the existence of God and of the Human Soul, which are the foundations of his Metaphysic; in the fifth, the order of the Physical questions which he has investigated, and, in particular, the explication of the motion of the heart and of some other difficulties pertaining to Medicine, as also the difference between the soul of man and that of the brutes; and, in the last, what the Author believes to be required in order to greater advancement in the investigation of Nature than has yet been made, with the reasons that have induced him to write. PART I Good sense is, of all things among men, the most equally distributed; for every one thinks himself so abundantly provided with it, that those even who are the most difficult to satisfy in everything else, do not usually desire a larger measure of this quality than they already possess. And in this it is not likely that all are mistaken the conviction is rather to be held as testifying that the power of judging aright and of distinguishing truth from error, which is properly what is called good sense or reason, is by nature equal in all men; and that the diversity of our opinions, consequently, does not arise from some being endowed with a larger share of reason than others, but solely from this, that we conduct our thoughts along different ways, and do not fix our attention on the same…

全文を読む →

本書の主題

← デカルトに戻る