善悪の彼岸
- 言語:
- 英語
- 状態:
- 完全な作品
- 著者性:
- 著者自身による
- テキストの状態:
- 良好なテキスト
- 分量:
- 約 68,600 語 · 326 節
この作品を引用
- APAニーチェ. (n.d.). 善悪の彼岸. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/nietzsche/beyond-good-and-evil
- MLAニーチェ. "善悪の彼岸." SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/nietzsche/beyond-good-and-evil.
- Chicagoニーチェ. 善悪の彼岸. SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/nietzsche/beyond-good-and-evil.
何についての本か
『善悪の彼岸』（一八八六年）。彼自身が『ツァラトゥストラ』の裏返しとして差し出した本で、論証がほしい人のために書かれている。
背景と歴史
なぜ我々は真理を欲するのか、なぜ非真理ではないのか、という問いから始まる。答えは、どんな哲学の背後にも一つの伝記と一つの意志があり、哲学者たちは自分の偏見を証明と取り違えてきた、というものである。主人の道徳と奴隷の道徳の区別はここにあり、彼の仕事全体のなかで最も歪めて伝えられている部分でもある。 オスカー・レヴィ編の全集（一九〇九—一九一三年）からの英訳で、パブリックドメインにあるものである。一世紀以上前のもので、それは読めばわかる。原文はドイツ語であり、引用は原文によるべきである。目録にあるドイツ語の原本は『ツァラトゥストラはこう言った』と『権力への意志』の二つだけで、ほかは翻訳しかない。
これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。
The following is a reprint of the Helen Zimmern translation from German into English of "Beyond Good and Evil," as published in The Complete Works of Friedrich Nietzsche (1909-1913). Some adaptations from the original text were made to format it into an e-text. Italics in the original book are capitalized in this e-text, except for most foreign language phrases that were italicized. Original footnotes are put in brackets "[]" at the points where they are cited in the text. Some spellings were altered. "To-day" and "To-morrow" are spelled "today" and "tomorrow." Some words containing the letters "ise" in the original text, such as "idealise," had these letters changed to "ize," such as "idealize." "Sceptic" was changed to "skeptic." TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE BEYOND GOOD AND EVIL CHAPTER I: PREJUDICES OF PHILOSOPHERS CHAPTER II: THE FREE SPIRIT CHAPTER III: THE RELIGIOUS MOOD CHAPTER IV: APOPHTHEGMS AND INTERLUDES CHAPTER V: THE NATURAL HISTORY OF MORALS CHAPTER VI: WE SCHOLARS CHAPTER VII: OUR VIRTUES CHAPTER VIII: PEOPLES AND COUNTRIES CHAPTER IX: WHAT IS NOBLE? FROM THE HEIGHTS (POEM TRANSLATED BY L.A. MAGNUS) PREFACE SUPPOSING that Truth is a woman--what then? Is there not ground for suspecting that all philosophers, in so far as they have been dogmatists, have failed to understand women--that the terrible seriousness and clumsy importunity with which they have usually paid their addresses to Truth, have been unskilled and unseemly methods for winning a woman? Certainly she has never allowed herself to be won; and at present every kind of dogma stands with sad and discouraged mien--IF, indeed, it stands at all! For there are scoffers who maintain that it has fallen, that all dogma lies on the ground--nay more, that it is at its last gasp.…