SigPhiSigPhi

Moral Letters to Lucilius (Epistulae Morales)

ルキウス・アンナエウス・セネカ

言語:
英語
翻訳:
Richard M. Gummere
状態:
完全な作品
著者性:
著者自身による
テキストの状態:
スキャンのノイズは検出されていません (全文に対する自動測定で、人の目では確認していません)
分量:
約 240,000 語 · 1,135 節
この作品を引用
  • APAルキウス・アンナエウス・セネカ. (n.d.). Moral Letters to Lucilius (Epistulae Morales) (Richard M. Gummere, Trans.). Digital reproduction: SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/seneca/moral-letters-to-lucilius-epistulae-morales
  • MLAルキウス・アンナエウス・セネカ. Moral Letters to Lucilius (Epistulae Morales). Translated by Richard M. Gummere. Digital reproduction, SigPhi, https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/seneca/moral-letters-to-lucilius-epistulae-morales.
  • Chicagoルキウス・アンナエウス・セネカ. Moral Letters to Lucilius (Epistulae Morales). Translated by Richard M. Gummere. Digital reproduction, SigPhi. https://sigphiai.com/ja/works/seneca/moral-letters-to-lucilius-epistulae-morales.

収録版の書誌情報です。SigPhi はデジタル複製です。判明している刊行年・出版社・翻訳者を記載し、年が不明の場合は「n.d.」と示します。

何についての本か

ルキリウス宛の百二十四通の手紙。いかに生きるべきか——浪費される時間、死の恐れ、友情、富、そして哲学に値するものと値しないもの。

背景と歴史

晩年、ネロの宮廷から身を引いたのちに書かれた。ほどなくそのネロによって自死を強いられることになる。往復書簡のように見えるが、おそらく完全にはそうではない。セネカは公刊を前提に書き継いだのであり、書簡という形式は方便なのだ。小さく具体的なことから始めて、論考の体裁をとらずに好きなところへ行き着ける。彼の正式な論考のほうが読みにくいのに、この書が今なお読まれているのはそのためである。

これは編集上の背景であり、引用できる典拠ではありません。作品本文の一節とは異なり、これらの記述はコーパスで検証できません。

収録版からの抜粋
after they have judged him. Ponder for a long time whether you shall admit a given person to your friendship; but when you have decided to admit him, welcome him with all your heart and soul. Speak as boldly with him as with yourself. As to yourself, although you should live in such a way that you trust your own self with nothing which you could not entrust even to your enemy, yet, since certain matters occur which convention keeps secret, you should share with a friend at least all your worries and reflections. Regard him as loyal, and you will make him loyal. Some, for example, fearing to be deceived, have taught men to deceive; by their suspicions they have given their friend the right to do wrong. Why need I keep back any words in the presence of my friend? Why should I not regard myself as alone when in his company? There is a class of men who communicate, to anyone whom they meet, matters which should be revealed to friends alone, and unload upon the chance listener whatever irks them. Others, again, fear to confide in their closest intimates; and if it were possible, they would not trust even themselves, burying their secrets deep in their hearts. But we should do neither. It is equally faulty to trust everyone and to trust no one. Yet the former fault is, I should say, the more ingenuous, the latter the more safe. In like manner you should rebuke these two kinds of men,—both those who always lack repose, and those who are always in repose. For love of bustle is not industry,—it is only the restlessness of a hunted mind. And true repose does not consist in condemning all motion as merely vexation; that kind of repose is slackness and inertia. Therefore, you should note the following saying, taken from my reading in Pomponius: “Some men shrink into dark corners, to such a degree that they see darkly by day.” No, men should combine these tendencies, and he who reposes should act and he who acts should take repose.…

この版を読む →

本書の主題

← ルキウス・アンナエウス・セネカに戻る